Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 9;105(36):13685-9.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807060105. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys

Affiliations

Giving is self-rewarding for monkeys

Frans B M de Waal et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Helping and sharing among humans is often motivated by empathy and accompanied by a sense of satisfaction. To determine whether similar self-rewarding mechanisms may underpin assistance among nonhuman primates, eight female brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) underwent testing in a simple choice paradigm. Paired with a partner, subjects could select either a "selfish" option that rewarded only themselves, or a "prosocial" option that rewarded both of them. Subjects systematically favored the prosocial option provided their partner was a) familiar, b) visible, and c) receiving rewards of equal value. Prosocial tendencies increased with social closeness, being lowest toward strangers and highest toward kin. That the monkeys understood the options was suggested by greater orientation to the partner during prosocial than selfish choices. Prosocial preferences were reduced by inequity, when the partner received a superior reward. If the view between both monkeys was blocked, choices became strikingly selfish. Thus, under certain conditions, delivering benefits to others seems gratifying to nonhuman primates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
The mean (+SEM) percentage of prosocial choices across trials for tests with familiar, visible partners with equal food rewards. The 30 trials per test are divided into three blocks of 10. Chance expectation is 50%. The linear upward trend is significant (see text).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The mean (±SEM) percent prosocial choices during the third 10-trail block for all eight testing rounds in the order in which they were conducted. This graph excludes individuals with extreme (>85%) side-bias during a given round, even though these individuals were included in statistical evaluations against 50% chance (*, P < 0.05, ***, P = 0.001).
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The mean (+SEM) orientation index for subject and partner during two trial phases (1, token choice; 2, reward acceptance and consumption). Data are divided according to the subject's token selection. The main significant effects (see text) were increased orientation by the subject to the other while making a prosocial choice, and increased mutual orientation during the second trial phase after prosocial choices.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Trivers RL. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol. 1971;46:35–57.
    1. Hamilton WD. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I & II. J Theor Biol. 1964;7:17–52. - PubMed
    1. de Waal FBM. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Ann Rev Psychol. 2008;59:279–300. - PubMed
    1. Batson CD. The Altruism Question: Toward a Social Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1991.
    1. Zak PJ, Stanton AA, Ahmadi S. Oxytocin increases generosity in humans. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e1128. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources