Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample
- PMID: 18758191
- DOI: 10.1159/000143212
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample
Abstract
Objective: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) is composed of 5 multi-item function scales and 9 symptom scales. The Korean EORTC QLQ-C30 was drawn up by the EORTC itself. However, its validity and reliability in the palliative care has not been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate the practicality, reliability, and validity of the Korean EORTC QLQ-C30 in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management.
Methods: The study was conducted from March 2003 to February 2004. The main sample consisted of 159 patients with cancer-related pain during the past week. To assess the severity and impact of pain, the patients completed the Korean version of the Brief Pain Inventory. We enrolled the patients with substantial pain who rated their worst pain as 5 or higher. The participants reported their worst pain of the previous week using the Brief Pain Inventory and were given the EORTC QLQ-C30 to fill out. Two weeks later, the patients were asked to complete the questionnaire a second time while they were on cancer pain management.
Results: The questionnaire was well accepted among terminally ill cancer patients. The scale reliability was very good [Cronbach's alpha: 0.80-0.91 (before treatment), 0.81-0.92 (on treatment)], except for cognitive function. In the initial measure of the QLQ-C30 for each patient, clinical validity was found for all the functional scales using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status Scale. Ninety-eight patients had improved cancer pain severity, 17 patients had deteriorated cancer pain, and 29 patients had unchanged pain. The differences in QLQ-C30 scores were compared between the improved and nonimproved cancer pain group. Statistically significant between-group differences over time were observed for the scales of global quality of life, fatigue, pain, nausea, and sleep disturbance.
Conclusions: Cronbach's alpha coefficient to judge internal consistency was very good except for cognitive functioning. The Korean QLQ-C30 has a strong validity in functional scales. Global quality of life, pain, fatigue, nausea, and sleep disturbance were improved after cancer pain management. These results support that the QLQ-C30 is a reliable and valid measure of quality of life in Korean cancer patients receiving cancer pain management. We consider that the QLQ-C30 can be used effectively in the palliative care settings in order to assess the effects of cancer pain management on quality of life of advanced-stage cancer patients.
Copyright 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: an examination into the cultural validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the EORTC QLQ-C30.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004 May;13(2):135-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2003.00435.x. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2004. PMID: 15115469
-
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30 version 3.0 Turkish) in cancer patients receiving palliative radiotherapy.Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007 May;16(3):251-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2006.00733.x. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2007. PMID: 17508945
-
Validation of the Mexican Spanish version of the EORTC C30 and STO22 questionnaires for the evaluation of health-related quality of life in patients with gastric cancer.Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jan;16(1):88-95. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-0175-9. Epub 2008 Nov 1. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009. PMID: 18979141
-
Comparison of instruments for measuring quality of life in patients with lung cancer.Semin Oncol. 1996 Apr;23(2 Suppl 5):31-40. Semin Oncol. 1996. PMID: 8610235 Review.
-
Psychometric validation of the Moroccan version of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in colorectal Cancer patients: cross-sectional study and systematic literature review.BMC Cancer. 2021 Jan 27;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-07793-w. BMC Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33499819 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Psychological barriers to the use of opioid analgesics for treating pain in patients with advanced recurrent cancer (BAROC): protocol for a multicentre cohort study.BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 31;12(3):e054914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054914. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35361645 Free PMC article.
-
Self-care as a mediator between symptom-management self-efficacy and quality of life in women with breast cancer.PLoS One. 2021 Feb 4;16(2):e0246430. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246430. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33539460 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot study of effective methods for measuring and stretching for pectoral muscle tightness in breast cancer patients.J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Nov;28(11):3030-3035. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3030. Epub 2016 Nov 29. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016. PMID: 27942114 Free PMC article.
-
Opioid-taking self-efficacy affects the quality of life of Taiwanese patients with cancer pain.Support Care Cancer. 2015 Jul;23(7):2113-20. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2575-7. Epub 2014 Dec 30. Support Care Cancer. 2015. PMID: 25547481
-
Intradermal Acupuncture Along with Analgesics for Pain Control in Advanced Cancer Cases: A Pilot, Randomized, Patient-Assessor-Blinded, Controlled Trial.Integr Cancer Ther. 2018 Dec;17(4):1137-1143. doi: 10.1177/1534735418786797. Epub 2018 Jul 16. Integr Cancer Ther. 2018. PMID: 30009652 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous