Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;18(12):1539-43.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-008-9655-z. Epub 2008 Aug 29.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery

Affiliations

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revision procedure after restrictive bariatric surgery

Hugo Sanchez et al. Obes Surg. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Adjustable gastric banding (AGB) and vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) have been extensively used to treat morbid obesity. Patients with insufficient weight loss or complications may require surgical revision. The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is one of the most common procedures currently used for revision. The aim of the study was to analyze surgical outcomes of 30 consecutive patients who underwent revision to LRYGBP in a 2-year period.

Methods: The prospectively constructed database and the medical records of all patients undergoing revision to LRYGBP were reviewed. Demographics, surgical details, results, and complications were analyzed.

Results: There were 23 women and seven men with a mean age of 41.1+/-9.7 years (r=25-61). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 40.0+/-7.5 kg/m(2) (r=27.2-65.2). Initial operation was AGB in 24, VBG in five, and both in one patient. In ten patients, the band had been removed before revision, in 13 cases, band removal and LRYGBP were performed in one surgical intervention, and in two patients, it was performed in a two-step surgery. There were two conversions to open surgery. Five patients presented major surgical complications. Hospital stay averaged 5.1 days (r=3-25). Mean percent excess body weight loss at 6 and 12 months was 61.7+/-27.5 and 81.2+/-20.5 kg/m(2), respectively. Mean percent low body mass index at 6 and 12 months was 22.5+/-9.1 and 29.1+/-11.4 kg/m(2), respectively.

Conclusions: LRYGBP as a revision procedure is feasible in most patients. Surgical complications are more frequent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obes Surg. 2003 Jun;13(3):404-11 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2001 Dec;11(6):731-4 - PubMed
    1. Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):6-10; discussion 10-2 - PubMed
    1. Obes Surg. 2005 Mar;15(3):316-22 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 May-Jun;4(3):276-81 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources