Recognition memory: can you teach an old dogma new tricks?
- PMID: 18760687
- PMCID: PMC3109738
- DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.08.004
Recognition memory: can you teach an old dogma new tricks?
Abstract
Familiarity and recollection are components of recognition memory. Whether these underlie two separate processes or a single process differing only in memory strength is a matter of continued debate. In this issue of Neuron, Haskins et al. provide further evidence in support of a dual-process perspective, whereas Shrager et al. provide evidence supporting a single-process viewpoint.
Comment on
-
Activity in both hippocampus and perirhinal cortex predicts the memory strength of subsequently remembered information.Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):547-53. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.022. Neuron. 2008. PMID: 18760691 Free PMC article.
-
Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations.Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):554-60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.035. Neuron. 2008. PMID: 18760692
References
-
- Brown MW, Aggleton JP. Recognition memory: what are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001;2:51–61. - PubMed
-
- Davachi L. Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:693–700. - PubMed
-
- Graf P, Schacter DL. Unitization and grouping Mediate Dissociations in Memory for New Associations. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1989;15:930–960. - PubMed
-
- Haskins AL, Yonelinas AP, Quamme JR, Ranganath C. Perirhinal cortex supports encoding and familiarity-based recognition of novel associations. Neuron (in press) - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
