Gender perspectives in European research
- PMID: 18761409
- DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.07.011
Gender perspectives in European research
Abstract
Background: Attention to sex and gender aspects in biomedical and health-related research has been a major initiative of the EU gender equality policy for research. The EU funded GenderBasic project (2005-2008), conceived to stimulate this attention to sex and gender and to provide practical tools to researchers, resulted in the publication of 10 reviews by high-level scientists in a Supplement to Gender Medicine in December 2007: "Bringing Gender Expertise to Biomedical and Health-Related Research".
Methods: Four commissioned reviews covered methodological aspects of addressing sex and gender in biomedical research--ranging from basic, molecular to public health research--next to six reviews that addressed sex and gender aspects relevant to selected health areas: anxiety disorders, asthma, metabolic syndrome, nutrigenomics, osteoporosis and work-related health.
Results: The review articles, that were discussed at an expert meeting, attended - upon invitation - by a mixed audience of basic and clinical researchers, epidemiologists, social scientists and gender researchers, came up with excellent state of the art data, solutions to methodological and conceptual problems, practical tools and interesting questions for further research.
Conclusion: The expert meeting created great enthusiasm among the participants and a real exchange took place among researchers from various backgrounds. Most life sciences researchers were familiar with the concept of sex differences but confessed that the effects of socially constructed gender until now, had received too little attention. The GenderBasic project yielded three major achievements for European research: (1) it stimulated and promoted research into sex differences; (2) it stimulated research into the workings of gender, illustrated by useful examples in particular in understanding masculinity and its effects on the health of individual men; (3) it highlighted sex-gender interaction and granted gender a prominent place on the research agenda that resulted from GenderBasic. A final conclusion of the project was that it is not differences per se that are interesting but rather how, as a result of the interaction between sex and gender, differences develop. The European Commission selected the GenderBasic project itself as an excellent example of the positive impacts EU research can achieve and the project will be featured in a catalogue of 6th Framework Success Stories.
Similar articles
-
Sex and gender traps and springboards: a focus group study among gender researchers in medicine and health sciences.Health Care Women Int. 2012;33(8):739-55. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2011.645970. Health Care Women Int. 2012. PMID: 22827730
-
Gender equality in the work of local research ethics committees in Europe: a study of practice in five countries.J Med Ethics. 2007 Feb;33(2):107-12. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.015206. J Med Ethics. 2007. PMID: 17264199 Free PMC article.
-
[Failure effects and gender differences in perfectionism].Encephale. 2003 Mar-Apr;29(2):125-35. Encephale. 2003. PMID: 14567164 French.
-
[Sex/Gender research -- introduction and anesthesiological aspects].Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005 Apr;40(4):191-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-861249. Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2005. PMID: 15832237 Review. German.
-
Alternatives to animal experimentation in basic research.ALTEX. 2004;21 Suppl 1:3-31. ALTEX. 2004. PMID: 15586255 Review.
Cited by
-
A Guide to Applying the Sex-Gender Perspective to Nutritional Genomics.Nutrients. 2018 Dec 20;11(1):4. doi: 10.3390/nu11010004. Nutrients. 2018. PMID: 30577445 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex and Gender Influences on Cancer Immunotherapy Response.Biomedicines. 2020 Jul 21;8(7):232. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8070232. Biomedicines. 2020. PMID: 32708265 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A deeper consideration of sex/gender in quantitative health research: a checklist for incorporating multidimensionality, variety, embodiment, and intersectionality throughout the whole research process.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):180. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02258-7. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024. PMID: 39127659 Free PMC article.
-
Salivary/Serum Progesterone Ratio Differs Between Menstrual Cycle Phases but Not Between Populations: Implications for Health, Reproductive, and Behavioral Research.Am J Hum Biol. 2025 Jul;37(7):e70077. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.70077. Am J Hum Biol. 2025. PMID: 40631468 Free PMC article.
-
Confronting diversity in the production of clinical evidence goes beyond merely including under-represented groups in clinical trials.Trials. 2013 Jun 15;14:177. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-177. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23768231 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources