Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;43(6):1975-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00887.x. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data

Affiliations

Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data

Amy P Abernethy et al. Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether e/Tablets (wireless tablet computers used in community oncology clinics to collect review of systems information at point of care) are feasible, acceptable, and valid for collecting research-quality data in academic oncology. DATA/SETTING: Primary/Duke Breast Cancer Clinic.

Design: Pilot study enrolling sample of 66 breast cancer patients.

Methods: Data were collected using paper- and e/Tablet-based surveys: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy General, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast, MD Anderson Symptom Inventory, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), Self-Efficacy; and two questionnaires: feasibility, satisfaction.

Principal findings: Patients supported e/Tablets as: easy to read (94 percent), easy to respond to (98 percent), comfortable weight (87 percent). Generally, electronic responses validly reflected responses provided by standard paper data collection on nearly all subscales tested.

Conclusions: e/Tablets offer a valid, feasible, acceptable method for collecting research-quality, patient-reported outcomes data in outpatient academic oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
e/Tablet and Patient Care Monitor Report

References

    1. Abernethy A P, Herndon J E, Day J D, Hood L, Wheeler J, Patwardhan M, Shaw H, Lyerly H K. E-Tablets to Collect Research-Quality Patient-Reported Data. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2007;25:6609. - PubMed
    1. American Cancer Society. 2015 Goals of the American Cancer Society. 2007. [accessed on August 27, 2007]. Available at http://www.cancer.org/docroot/COM/content/div_PA/COM_4_2X_Volunteer_1108....
    1. Brady M J, Cella D F, Bonomi A E, Tulsky D S, Lloyd S R, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shiomoto G. Reliability and Validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Quality of Life Instruments. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15:974–86. - PubMed
    1. Brucker P, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General Population and Cancer Patient Norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy— General (FACT-G) Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2005;28:192–211. - PubMed
    1. Cella D, Fairclough D L, Bonomi P B, Kim K, Johnson D. Quality of Life in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results from Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Study E5592. Proceedings of the American Society for Clinical Oncology. 1997;16:2a. (abstract 4) - PubMed

Publication types