Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;90(9):1862-8.
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01580.

Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies

Luis A Corrales  1 , Saam Morshed, Mohit Bhandari, Theodore Miclau 3rd
Affiliations

Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies

Luis A Corrales et al. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of consensus among orthopaedic surgeons in the assessment of fracture-healing. We conducted a systematic review of recent clinical studies of long-bone fracture care that were published in three major orthopaedic journals to identify current definitions of fracture-healing.

Methods: MEDLINE and the computerized databases for The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume), The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume), and the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma were searched from January 1996 through December 2006 with use of title, abstract, keyword, and medical subject headings. Therapeutic clinical studies of long-bone fractures of the appendicular skeleton in adults in which fracture-healing was assessed were selected. Two reviewers independently identified articles and extracted data. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus. We qualitatively and quantitatively summarized the definition of fracture union and the reliability of the assessment of radiographic fracture-healing.

Results: One hundred and twenty-three studies proved to be eligible. Union was defined on the basis of a combination of clinical and radiographic criteria in 62% of the studies, on the basis of radiographic criteria only in 37%, and on the basis of clinical criteria only in 1%. Twelve different criteria were used to define fracture union clinically, and the most common criterion was the absence of pain or tenderness at the fracture site during weight-bearing. In studies involving the use of plain radiographs, eleven different criteria were used to define fracture union, and the most common criterion was bridging of the fracture site. A quantitative measure of the reliability of the radiographic assessment of fracture union was reported in two studies.

Conclusions: We found a lack of consensus with regard to the definition of fracture-healing in the current orthopaedic literature. Without valid and reliable clinical or radiographic measures of union, the interpretation of fracture care studies remains difficult.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram detailing literature search.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Einhorn TA. Enhancement of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:940-56. - PubMed
    1. Finkelstein EA, Corso PS, Miller T. The incidence and economic burden of injuries in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
    1. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:562-6. - PubMed
    1. Sarmiento A, Sharpe FE, Ebramzadeh E, Normand P, Shankwiler J. Factors influencing the outcome of closed tibial fractures treated with functional bracing. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;315:8-24. - PubMed
    1. Matthews LS, Kaufer H, Sonstegard DA. Manual sensing of fracture stability: a biomechanical study. Acta Orthop Scand. 1974;45:373-81. - PubMed

Publication types