The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty
- PMID: 18763889
- DOI: 10.1037/a0012638
The role of short-term memory capacity and task experience for overconfidence in judgment under uncertainty
Abstract
Research with general knowledge items demonstrates extreme overconfidence when people estimate confidence intervals for unknown quantities, but close to zero overconfidence when the same intervals are assessed by probability judgment. In 3 experiments, the authors investigated if the overconfidence specific to confidence intervals derives from limited task experience or from short-term memory limitations. As predicted by the naive sampling model (P. Juslin, A. Winman, & P. Hansson, 2007), overconfidence with probability judgment is rapidly reduced by additional task experience, whereas overconfidence with intuitive confidence intervals is minimally affected even by extensive task experience. In contrast to the minor bias with probability judgment, the extreme overconfidence bias with intuitive confidence intervals is correlated with short-term memory capacity. The proposed interpretation is that increased task experience is not sufficient to cure the overconfidence with confidence intervals because it stems from short-term memory limitations.
(c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Adult age differences in the realism of confidence judgments: overconfidence, format dependence, and cognitive predictors.Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):531-44. doi: 10.1037/a0012782. Psychol Aging. 2008. PMID: 18808243
-
The naïve intuitive statistician: a naïve sampling model of intuitive confidence intervals.Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):678-703. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.678. Psychol Rev. 2007. PMID: 17638502
-
Go with the flow: How to master a nonlinear multiple-cue judgment task.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1371-84. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1371. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006. PMID: 17087590
-
Perceptions of randomness: why three heads are better than four.Psychol Rev. 2009 Apr;116(2):454-61. doi: 10.1037/a0015241. Psychol Rev. 2009. PMID: 19348550 Review.
-
The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:1-25. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00001-0. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012. PMID: 23205406 Review.
Cited by
-
Lexical stress assignment as a problem of probabilistic inference.Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Oct;22(5):1174-92. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0802-y. Psychon Bull Rev. 2015. PMID: 25636917
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials