Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Oct 7;99(7):1176-8.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604638. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

Complexities in the estimation of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening

Affiliations

Complexities in the estimation of overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening

S W Duffy et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

There is interest in estimating and attributing temporal changes in incidence of breast cancer in relation to the initiation of screening programmes, in particular to estimation of overdiagnosis of breast cancer as a result of screening. In this paper, we show how screening introduces complexities of analysis and interpretation of incidence data. For example, lead time brings forward time- and age-related increases in incidence. In addition, risk factors such as hormone replacement therapy use have been changing contemporaneously with the introduction of screening. Although we do not indicate exactly how such complexities should be corrected for, we use some simple informal adjustments to show how they may account for a substantial proportion of increased incidence, which might otherwise erroneously have been attributed to overdiagnosis. We illustrate this using an example of analysis of breast cancer incidence data from Sweden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age-specific breast cancer incidence in the UK in 1985, before the screening programme, and 1995, during the screening programme, with expected incidence in 1995 calculated from incidence trends observed before the breast screening programme began.

Comment in

References

    1. Beral V, Million Women Study Collaborators (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the Million Women Study. Lancet 362: 419–427 - PubMed
    1. Biesheuvel C, Barratt A, Howard K, Houssami N, Irwig L (2007) Effects of study methods and biases on estimates of invasive breast cancer overdetection with mammography screening: a systematic review. Lancet Oncol 8: 1129–1138 - PubMed
    1. Botha JL, Bray F, Sankila R, Parkin DM (2003) Breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in 16 European countries. Eur J Cancer 39: 1718–1729 - PubMed
    1. Chu KC, Tarone RE, Kessler LG, Ries LA, Hankey BF, Miller BA, Edwards BK (1996) Recent trends in US breast cancer incidence, survival, and mortality rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 88: 1571–1579 - PubMed
    1. Duffy SW, Jonsson H, Agbaje OF, Pashayan N, Gabe R (2007) Avoiding bias from aggregate measures of exposure. J Epidemiol Community Health 61: 461–463 - PMC - PubMed