The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops
- PMID: 18768818
 - PMCID: PMC2544565
 - DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0803780105
 
The genetic expectations of a protracted model for the origins of domesticated crops
Abstract
Until recently, domestication has been interpreted as a rapid process with little predomestication cultivation and a relatively rapid rise of the domestication syndrome. This interpretation has had a profound effect on the biological framework within which investigations into crop origins have been carried out. A major underlying assumption has been that artificial selection pressures were substantially stronger than natural selection pressures, resulting in genetic patterns of diversity that reflect genetic independence of geographic localities. Recent archaeobotanical evidence has overturned the notion of a rapid transition, resulting in a protracted model that undermines these assumptions. Conclusions of genome-wide multilocus studies remain problematic in their support of a rapid-transition model by indicating that domesticated crops appear to be associated by monophyly with only a single geographic locality. Simulations presented here resolve this conflict, indicating that the results observed in such studies are inevitable over time at a rate that is largely influenced by the long-term population size. Counterintuitively, multiple origin crops are shown to be more likely to produce monophyletic clades than crops of a single origin. Under the protracted transition, the importance of the rise of the domestication syndrome becomes paramount in producing the patterns of genetic diversity from which crop origins may be deduced. We identify four different interacting levels of organization that now need to be considered to track crop origins from modern genetic diversity, making crop origins a problem that could be addressed through system-based approaches.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
              
              
              
              
                
                
                
              
              
              
              
                
                
                Comment in
- 
  
  Detecting multiple origins of domesticated crops.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Sep 16;105(37):13701-2. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807439105. Epub 2008 Sep 10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. PMID: 18784363 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
 - 
  
  Multiple domestications do not appear monophyletic.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Dec 9;105(49):E105; author reply E106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0809042105. Epub 2008 Dec 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. PMID: 19057016 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
 
References
- 
    
- Darwin C. Origin of Species. London: Murray; 1859. Variation under domestication; pp. 7–43.
 
 - 
    
- Darwin C. Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication, 2 vols. London: Murray; 1868.
 
 - 
    
- Blumer MA. Independent inventionism and recent genetic evidence on plant domestication. Econ Bot. 1992;46:98–111.
 
 - 
    
- Diamond J. Location, location, location: The first farmers. Science. 1997;278:1243–1244.
 
 
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
