Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2008 Jul-Sep;5(3):140-4.
doi: 10.4161/rna.5.3.6839. Epub 2008 Jul 20.

A brilliant disguise for self RNA: 5'-end and internal modifications of primary transcripts suppress elements of innate immunity

Affiliations
Review

A brilliant disguise for self RNA: 5'-end and internal modifications of primary transcripts suppress elements of innate immunity

Subba Rao Nallagatla et al. RNA Biol. 2008 Jul-Sep.

Abstract

Interferon inducible protein kinase PKR is a component of innate immunity and mediates antiviral actions by recognizing pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). A well-known activator of PKR is long dsRNA, which can be produced during viral replication. Our recent results indicate that PKR can also be activated by short stem-loop RNA in a 5'-triphosphate-dependent fashion. A 5'-triphosphate is present primarily in foreign RNAs such as viral and bacterial transcripts, while a non-activating 5'-cap or 5'-monophosphate is present in most cellular RNAs. Additional studies indicate that internal RNA modifications and non-Watson-Crick motifs also repress PKR activation, and do so in an RNA structure-specific fashion. Interestingly, self-RNAs have more nucleoside modifications than non-self RNAs. Internal and 5'-end RNA modifications have repressive effects on other innate immune sensors as well, including TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, and RIG-I, suggesting that nucleoside modifications suppress innate immunity on a wide scale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of modified nucleosides. Unmodified uridine (U) and adenosine (A) are depicted. Position of change in atom or functional group is shown.

References

    1. Stark GR, Kerr IM, Williams BR, Silverman RH, Schreiber RD. How cells respond to interferons. Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:227–64. - PubMed
    1. Samuel CE. Antiviral actions of interferons. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2001;14:778–809. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Borden EC, Sen GC, Uze G, Silverman RH, Ransohoff RM, Foster GR, Stark GR. Interferons at age 50: past, current and future impact on biomedicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007;6:975–90. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson AJ, Locarnini SA. Toll-like receptors, RIG-I-like RNA helicases and the antiviral innate immune response. Immunol Cell Biol. 2007;85:435–45. - PubMed
    1. Kariko K, Weissman D. Naturally occurring nucleoside modifications suppress the immunostimulatory activity of RNA: implication for therapeutic RNA development. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007;10:523–32. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources