Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses
- PMID: 18769946
- DOI: 10.1007/s00784-008-0224-6
Precision of fit: zirconia three-unit fixed dental prostheses
Abstract
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the precision of fit of substructures milled from semi-sintered zirconia blocks fabricated with two different computer-assisted design (CAD)/computer-assisted manufacturing (CAM) systems. Three-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDP) were fabricated for standardized dies (n = 10) with the Lava CAD/CAM system (Lava) and the Procera-bridge-zirconia CAD/CAM system (Procera). After cementation to the dies, the FDP were embedded and sectioned. Four cross-sections were made of each abutment tooth, and marginal and internal fit were evaluated under an optical microscope. A one-way analysis of variance was used to compare data (alpha = 0.05). Mean gap dimensions at the marginal opening for Lava and Procera were 15 (+/-7) microm and 9 (+/-5) microm, respectively. Mean marginal openings (P = 0.012) and internal adaptation at two out of three measurement locations were significantly different. Within the limitations of this study, the results suggest that the accuracy of both investigated systems is satisfactory for clinical use.
Similar articles
-
A comparison of the marginal vertical discrepancies of zirconium and metal ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses before and after cementation.J Prosthet Dent. 2009 Dec;102(6):378-84. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60198-0. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. PMID: 19961996
-
Marginal fit of 14-unit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis retainers.J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Feb;36(2):142-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01908.x. Epub 2008 Oct 29. J Oral Rehabil. 2009. PMID: 18976261
-
Marginal and internal fits of fixed dental prostheses zirconia retainers.Dent Mater. 2009 Jan;25(1):94-102. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.04.018. Epub 2008 Jul 11. Dent Mater. 2009. PMID: 18620749
-
Variables affecting the fit of zirconia fixed partial dentures: A systematic review.J Prosthet Dent. 2020 May;123(5):686-692.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.06.019. Epub 2019 Nov 5. J Prosthet Dent. 2020. PMID: 31703922
-
Advantages and drawbacks of different methods to measure marginal gaps in fixed dental prostheses: A scoping review.J Dent. 2024 Dec;151:105400. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105400. Epub 2024 Oct 10. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 39393607
Cited by
-
Fracture resistance of three-unit zirconia fixed partial denture with modified framework.Odontology. 2017 Jan;105(1):62-67. doi: 10.1007/s10266-016-0242-9. Epub 2016 Apr 15. Odontology. 2017. PMID: 27083582
-
Fit of 4-unit FDPs from CoCr and zirconia after conventional and digital impressions.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):283-9. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1513-5. Epub 2015 Jun 30. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26121970
-
Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques.Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(2):515-23. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2. Epub 2013 May 29. Clin Oral Investig. 2014. PMID: 23716064
-
Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy.Clin Oral Investig. 2011 Aug;15(4):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0415-9. Epub 2010 May 22. Clin Oral Investig. 2011. PMID: 20495937
-
Evaluation of different approaches for using a laser scanner in digitization of dental impressions.J Adv Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;6(1):22-9. doi: 10.4047/jap.2014.6.1.22. Epub 2014 Feb 14. J Adv Prosthodont. 2014. PMID: 24605202 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous