Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes
- PMID: 18771976
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.06.076
Early-onset severe preeclampsia: induction of labor vs elective cesarean delivery and neonatal outcomes
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe the success rate of and analyze differences in neonatal outcomes with labor induction, compared with elective cesarean delivery in women with early-onset severe preeclampsia.
Study design: We conducted a cross-sectional study of women with severe preeclampsia who required delivery between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation. Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were used to determine factors that were associated with assignment to, success of, and odds of neonatal outcomes after induction of labor.
Results: Fifty-seven and four-tenths percent of 491 women underwent induction of labor. Vaginal delivery occurred in 6.7%, 47.5%, and 68.8% of women who underwent labor induction between 24 and 28, 28 and 32, and 32 and 34 weeks of gestation, respectively. Induction of labor was not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity or mortality rate after we controlled for gestational age and other confounders.
Conclusion: Neonatal outcomes are not worsened by induction of labor in women with early-onset severe preeclampsia, although it is rarely successful at <28 weeks of gestation.
Similar articles
-
Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 May;23(5):383-8. doi: 10.3109/14767050903168432. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010. PMID: 19951010
-
Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.J Reprod Med. 2005 Apr;50(4):235-40. J Reprod Med. 2005. PMID: 15916205
-
Induction or caesarean section for preterm pre-eclampsia?J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Jul;22(4):353-6. doi: 10.1080/01443610220141245. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002. PMID: 12521452
-
Mode of delivery in the early preterm infant (<28 weeks).BJOG. 2006 Dec;113 Suppl 3:81-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01129.x. BJOG. 2006. PMID: 17206971 Review.
-
[INDUCTION OF LABOR AT 39 WEEKS OF GESTATION VERSUS EXPECTANT MANAGEMENT].Harefuah. 2019 Dec;158(12):802-806. Harefuah. 2019. PMID: 31823535 Review. Hebrew.
Cited by
-
A systematic scoping review of clinical indications for induction of labour.PLoS One. 2020 Jan 29;15(1):e0228196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228196. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 31995603 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for adverse outcomes in vaginal preterm breech labor.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jan;303(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05731-y. Epub 2020 Aug 7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021. PMID: 32767041 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Modes and Timings of Delivery on Feto-Maternal Outcomes in Women with Severe Preeclampsia: A Multi-Center Survey in Mainland China.Int J Gen Med. 2021 Dec 14;14:9681-9687. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S335893. eCollection 2021. Int J Gen Med. 2021. PMID: 34934345 Free PMC article.
-
Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for severe pre-eclampsia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 23;10(10):CD009430. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009430.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29058762 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the efficacy of intravenous labetalol versus oral nifedipine in patients with severe pregnancy-induced hypertension beyond 30 weeks of gestation.J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Dec;12(12):3119-3122. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2427_22. Epub 2023 Dec 21. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023. PMID: 38361866 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical