Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1991 Jul;155(1):43-6.

Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?

Affiliations

Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?

M A Sutton et al. West J Med. 1991 Jul.

Abstract

Many groups have taken the position that the digital rectal examination should be discontinued as part of the annual screening physical examination. We examined the effects of not doing a digital rectal examination on the early diagnosis of prostate cancer. The average time since a previous rectal examination increased as the stage of cancer increased. The digital rectal examination proved to be a relatively insensitive test, with 40% of stage D cancers being detected initially within 12 months of the most recent examination. Nevertheless, an annual digital rectal examination did detect a greater percentage of lower stage (and thus more localized and potentially curable) cancers when repeated within 12 months. When the last rectal examination was more than 24 months previous, cancers detected were more likely to be advanced. Without a digital rectal examination, patients would have their disease detected only by the presence of symptoms. When it was done because of symptoms, 81% of our patients had stage D cancers compared with 32% of stage B and 38% of stage C patients. Without the routine use of this examination, patients with prostate cancer would be more likely to have higher stage and less potentially curable lesions at the time of diagnosis. We conclude that the digital rectal examination remains an important part of routine annual physical examinations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. J Urol. 1956 Sep;76(3):287-91 - PubMed
    1. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1954 Oct;68(2):603-16 - PubMed
    1. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1988;269:111-22 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1988 Aug;168(2):389-94 - PubMed
    1. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1987;104:33-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources