Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients
- PMID: 18774041
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2007.10.042
Application of San Francisco Syncope Rule in elderly ED patients
Abstract
Objectives: The San Francisco Syncope Rule (SFSR) is a decision rule with the potential to identify patients at risk for serious outcomes within 7 days of the emergency department (ED) visit for syncope. The initial studies of the SFSR reported a high sensitivity and specificity for identifying patients, of all ages, with serious outcomes. Our objective was to determine if the SFSR can be safely and accurately applied to ED patients aged 65 and older with syncope or near-syncope.
Methods: A retrospective review of ED patients aged 65 years and older with syncope or near-syncope between January 2000 and August 2001 was performed. Charts were reviewed for evidence of SFSR risks for the ED visit and serious outcomes within 7 days of the ED visit.
Results: Of 773 subjects identified as having syncope or near-syncope, 517 subjects were included. There were 98 patients with serious outcomes. Twenty-three patients who were negative on SFSR had serious outcomes. The sensitivity and specificity of the SFSR were 76.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 66.7%-84.3%) and 36.8% (95% CI, 32.2%-41.6%), respectively. The negative and positive predictive values were 87.0% (95% CI, 80.9%-91.4%) and 22.1% (95% CI, 17.8%-26.9%), respectively.
Conclusions: In our cohort of elderly ED patients, the SFSR had a lower sensitivity and specificity. The SFSR may not be applicable to the elderly ED population. Future prospective validation is necessary before application to the ED elderly population.
Similar articles
-
External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule.Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;49(4):420-7, 427.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.11.012. Epub 2007 Jan 8. Ann Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17210201
-
The Risk stratification Of Syncope in the Emergency department (ROSE) pilot study: a comparison of existing syncope guidelines.Emerg Med J. 2007 Apr;24(4):270-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2006.042739. Emerg Med J. 2007. PMID: 17384381 Free PMC article.
-
The San Francisco Syncope Rule vs physician judgment and decision making.Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;23(6):782-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2004.11.009. Am J Emerg Med. 2005. PMID: 16182988
-
Diagnosis and evaluation of syncope in the emergency department.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010 Aug;28(3):471-85. doi: 10.1016/j.emc.2010.03.007. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20709239 Review.
-
Collapse query cause: the management of adult syncope in the emergency department.Emerg Med J. 2006 Aug;23(8):589-94. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.032136. Emerg Med J. 2006. PMID: 16858087 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Current issues with prediction rules for syncope.CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):1694-5. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.111529. Epub 2011 Sep 26. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 21948727 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict short-term serious outcomes: a systematic review.CMAJ. 2011 Oct 18;183(15):E1116-26. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.101326. Epub 2011 Sep 26. CMAJ. 2011. PMID: 21948723 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency department observation units and the older patient.Clin Geriatr Med. 2013 Feb;29(1):71-89. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2012.09.002. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013. PMID: 23177601 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy and quality of clinical decision rules for syncope in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Emerg Med. 2010 Oct;56(4):362-373.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2010.05.013. Ann Emerg Med. 2010. PMID: 20868906 Free PMC article.
-
Syncope risk stratification in the ED: directions for future research.Acad Emerg Med. 2013 May;20(5):503-6. doi: 10.1111/acem.12122. Acad Emerg Med. 2013. PMID: 23672365 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical