Screening for prostate cancer (PC)--an update on recent findings of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
- PMID: 18774469
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.03.011
Screening for prostate cancer (PC)--an update on recent findings of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC)
Abstract
Introduction for screening for prostate cancer as a healthcare policy is desirable provided its effectiveness can be shown in terms of decreasing prostate cancer mortality at an acceptable price in terms of quality of life and costs. The European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) was initiated in 1993 and should in 2008 have the power to produce the required information. The structure and status of ERSPC. ERSPC is a randomized controlled trial running in eight European countries (Belgium, Finland, France, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland). A total of 267,994 have been randomized to screening vs. control. An interim look at the data has taken place in 2006; the advice of the Data Monitoring Committee was to continue the study. This was based on a total of 23,794 deaths in both study groups, 6,033 cases of prostate cancer detected in both groups of which about 1, 200 had died. Contributions to a better understanding of the screening methodology. ERSPC has contributed with a large number of publications, either coming from individual centers or combining data of several centers. A complete listing can be found at www.erspc.org. Lead-time and overdiagnosis with the screening regimen utilized in ERSPC Rotterdam were established to amount to 10.3 years and 54%. This information is of great importance for the development of further screening strategies. During the process of ERSPC, digital rectal examination was omitted and replaced by the inclusion of PSA 3-4 as a biopsy indication. The data on which this decision has been based were published and validated. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment have an adverse influence on quality of life, as it will be included in the evaluation of ERSPC. The recent development of a nomogram for the identification of indolent disease is a major step to improve on this outcome parameter. The application of this nomogram to screen detected cases allows the the advice "active observation" to about 30% of such patients. ERSPC is set to show or exclude at least a 25% reduction in prostate cancer mortality through screening. Many pending problems still have to be resolved prior to the introduction of populations based screening as a worldwide healthcare policy.
Similar articles
-
Detection of prostate cancer: the impact of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC).Can J Urol. 2005 Feb;12 Suppl 1:2-6; discussion 92-3. Can J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15780157 Review.
-
[Results and participation factors to the European Randomized study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with Prostate Specific Antigen: French departments of Tarn and Hérault].Prog Urol. 2009 Jul;19(7):487-98. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2009.03.001. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Prog Urol. 2009. PMID: 19559380 Clinical Trial. French.
-
Is it necessary to detect all prostate cancers in men with serum PSA levels <3.0 ng/ml? A comparison of biopsy results of PCPT and outcome-related information from ERSPC.Eur Urol. 2008 May;53(5):901-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.01.048. Epub 2008 Jan 28. Eur Urol. 2008. PMID: 18262712 Clinical Trial.
-
Interval cancers in prostate cancer screening: comparing 2- and 4-year screening intervals in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer, Gothenburg and Rotterdam.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 5;99(17):1296-303. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm101. Epub 2007 Aug 28. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007. PMID: 17728218 Clinical Trial.
-
Overall and disease-specific survival of patients with screen-detected prostate cancer in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer, section Rotterdam.Eur Urol. 2007 Feb;51(2):366-74; discussion 374. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.07.052. Epub 2006 Aug 15. Eur Urol. 2007. PMID: 16930812 Review.
Cited by
-
Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer -choosing the middle ground.Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Aug;3(4):333-335. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1131. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009. PMID: 19672450 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
[Cancer screening: curative or harmful? An ethical dilemma facing the physician].Urologe A. 2011 Dec;50(12):1595-9. doi: 10.1007/s00120-011-2727-z. Urologe A. 2011. PMID: 22009258 Review. German.
-
Early prostate-specific antigen changes and the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer.Curr Opin Urol. 2009 May;19(3):221-6. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32832a2d10. Curr Opin Urol. 2009. PMID: 19318948 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Correlation and diagnostic performance of the prostate-specific antigen level with the diagnosis, aggressiveness, and bone metastasis of prostate cancer in clinical practice.Prostate Int. 2014 Sep;2(3):133-9. doi: 10.12954/PI.14054. Epub 2014 Jul 30. Prostate Int. 2014. PMID: 25325025 Free PMC article.
-
Changes in health utilities and health-related quality of life over 12 months following radical prostatectomy.Can Urol Assoc J. 2009 Dec;3(6):445-52. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.1171. Can Urol Assoc J. 2009. PMID: 20019969 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous