Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases
- PMID: 18775034
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2008.02132.x
Comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a single-center experience of 100 cases
Abstract
Objectives: To report our experience with the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
Methods: Between July 2001 and December 2007, 100 patients with RCC underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy at our institution for clinically localized RCC. Fifty-three patients received a retroperitoneal procedure and 47 received a transperitoneal procedure. The perioperative and oncological outcomes of these groups were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: Mean follow up was 34 months. No statistically significant difference was found between the two approaches in terms of pathological stage, operative time, need for additional procedures such as adrenalectomy and/or lymph node sampling, estimated blood loss, need for blood transfusions, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, or the incidence of minor or major complications. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 90% for both the retroperitoneal and transperitoneal procedures. The 5-year overall survival rates were 98% and 96%, respectively. Therefore, no significant difference was observed in the long-term oncological outcome between the two groups.
Conclusions: Tumor control and surgical morbidity in laparoscopic radical nephrectomy seem not to be significantly influenced by the approach.
Similar articles
-
Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy.Urology. 2004 Nov;64(5):919-24. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.057. Urology. 2004. PMID: 15533478 Clinical Trial.
-
Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy.J Urol. 2005 Jan;173(1):38-41. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000145886.26719.73. J Urol. 2005. PMID: 15592021 Clinical Trial.
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: surgical experience and outcomes.J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4):1279-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.06.015. Epub 2008 Aug 15. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18707736
-
Laparoscopic and partial nephrectomy.Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Sep 15;10(18 Pt 2):6322S-7S. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-050003. Clin Cancer Res. 2004. PMID: 15448025 Review.
-
Retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: experience of 23 cases.Urol Int. 2004;72(1):66-70. doi: 10.1159/000075276. Urol Int. 2004. PMID: 14730169 Review.
Cited by
-
Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a double-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial.BMC Urol. 2024 Feb 3;24(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12894-023-01364-w. BMC Urol. 2024. PMID: 38310213 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for large-volume renal carcinoma (> 7 cm): a systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes.World J Surg Oncol. 2023 Mar 9;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12957-023-02967-1. World J Surg Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36894912 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical