Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 Jan;20(1):22-8.
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01275.x. Epub 2008 Sep 3.

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2: results from a randomized study comparing pulmonary vein isolation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy

Giovanni B Forleo et al. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) often coexist; however, a small number of patients with DM2 undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of AF have been included in previous studies. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of ablation therapy in DM2 patients with drug refractory AF.

Methods and results: From January 2005 to September 2006, 70 patients with a diagnosis of DM2 and paroxysmal (n = 29) or persistent (n = 41) AF were randomized to receive either pulmonary vein isolation or a new antiarrhythmic drug treatment (ADT) with a 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was the time to first AF recurrence. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, at the end of follow-up, 42.9% of patients in the ADT group and 80% of patients who received a single ablation procedure and were without medications were free of AF (P = 0.001). In the ablation group, a significant improvement in quality-of-life (QoL) scores as compared with ADT group was observed. Six patients in the ADT group (17.1%) developed significant adverse drug effects. Hospitalization rate during follow-up was higher in the ADT group (P = 0.01). The only complication attributable to ablation was one significant access-site hematoma.

Conclusion: In patients with DM2, CA of AF provides significant clinical benefits over the ADT and appears to be a reasonable approach regarding feasibility, effectiveness, and low procedural risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources