The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric long-term investigation

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to assess the number of, and the interrelation between, skeletal and dental components that contribute to Class II relapse after Herbst treatment. A comparison was made between 15 relapse and 14 stable cases at least 5 years after treatment. Lateral cephalograms taken before and immediately after Herbst treatment, as well as 6 months and 5 to 10 years after treatment, were analyzed. The results revealed that relapse in the overjet and sagittal molar relationship resulted mainly from posttreatment maxillary and mandibular dental changes. In particular, the maxillary incisors and molars moved significantly (p less than 0.05) to a more anterior position in the relapse group than in the stable group. The interrelation between maxillary and mandibular posttreatment growth was favorable and did not contribute to the occlusal relapse. It is hypothesized that the main causes of the Class II relapse in patients treated with the Herbst appliance were a persisting lip-tongue dysfunction habit and an unstable cuspal interdigitation after treatment.