Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities
- PMID: 1877608
Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities
Abstract
This Article considers the influence and implications of the application of genetic technologies to definitions of disease and to the treatment of illness. The concept of "geneticization" is introduced to emphasize the dominant discourse in today's stories of health and disease and the social construction of biological phenomenon is described. The reassurance, choice and control supposedly provided by prenatal genetic testing and screening are critically examined, and their role in constructing the need for such technology is addressed. Using the stories told about prenatal diagnosis as a focus, the consequences of a genetic perspective for and on women and their health care needs are explored.
PIP: Over the last 20 years, a growing number of techniques have been developed which allow geneticists to determine the physical condition of a fetus. These tests constitute the most widespread application of genetic technology for humans. The primary focus of this paper is to examine and discuss how disease categories and biomedical practices are constructed within their cultural context. Also, technical information regarding prenatal diagnosis is discussed. There are assumptions already built into how medicine and society views defects or abnormalities. Genetic screening is offered as a method of detecting a fetus with defects, thus giving women the choice to abort the fetus. However, another way of looking at the whole situation is to question whether our society may have a defect for not being able to accept people with disabilities or abnormalities. A physical abnormality often only becomes a problem when it is put in a social context. The use of genetic testing is clearly more of a social use of genetic technology than a medical use.
Similar articles
-
Attitudes of a high-risk group of pregnant Saudi Arabian women to prenatal screening for chromosomal anomalies.East Mediterr Health J. 2004 Jul-Sep;10(4-5):522-7. East Mediterr Health J. 2004. PMID: 16335642
-
Fetal privacy and confidentiality.Hastings Cent Rep. 1995 Sep-Oct;25(5):32-9. Hastings Cent Rep. 1995. PMID: 8530268
-
The quest for the perfect baby: why do Israeli women seek prenatal genetic testing?Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Jan;28(1):21-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00481.x. Sociol Health Illn. 2006. PMID: 16509941
-
Prenatal genetic screening.Online J Issues Nurs. 2000;5(3):2. Online J Issues Nurs. 2000. PMID: 11380268 Review.
-
Prenatal diagnosis and genetic screening--integration into prenatal care.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008 Sep;35(3):435-58, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2008.05.002. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2008. PMID: 18760229 Review.
Cited by
-
Megatrends in Healthcare: Review for the Swiss National Science Foundation's National Research Programme 74 (NRP74) "Smarter Health Care".Public Health Rev. 2022 Mar 22;43:1604434. doi: 10.3389/phrs.2022.1604434. eCollection 2022. Public Health Rev. 2022. PMID: 35528712 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of non-directiveness in genetic counseling.Med Health Care Philos. 2002;5(1):53-63. doi: 10.1023/a:1014289418443. Med Health Care Philos. 2002. PMID: 11954994
-
Micro-anatomo politics: mapping the Human Genome Project.Cult Med Psychiatry. 1993 Mar;17(1):27-41. doi: 10.1007/BF01380597. Cult Med Psychiatry. 1993. PMID: 8354070 Review. No abstract available.
-
Ethical considerations in prenatal diagnosis.West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):391-5. West J Med. 1993. PMID: 8236982 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Whole-Genome Sequencing and Disability in the NICU: Exploring Practical and Ethical Challenges.Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S47-55. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3731I. Pediatrics. 2016. PMID: 26729703 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical