Presence of a high-grade component in gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is not associated with an adverse prognosis

Abstract

Gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma and diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) show a spectrum of disease characterized by varying proportions of low-grade and high-grade components. While the natural history and optimum treatment for low-grade gastric MALT lymphoma and DLBCL is well established, the prognosis and optimal treatment of patients with both low- and high-grade components is not well established. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with gastric MALT lymphoma and gastric DLBCL. A retrospective review of patients with gastric MALT lymphoma, gastric DLBCL, or MALT lymphoma with a high-grade component treated at our centers from 1994 to 2006 was performed. Patients were divided into three categories: "pure MALT lymphoma," "MALT lymphoma with high-grade component" (mixed), and "pure DLBCL." Seventy-six patients were included in our study-26 with pure MALT, 22 with MALT with high-grade component ("mixed"), and 28 with pure DLBCL. Pure MALT lymphoma and mixed lymphoma patients had similar clinical characteristics, whereas pure DLBCL patients had less favorable disease characteristics with significantly poorer performance status, higher number of extranodal sites of disease, higher stage, and larger proportion of bone marrow involvement and international prognostic index (IPI) scores compared with mixed lymphoma. The majority of mixed lymphoma (72.7%) and DLBCL patients (71.4%) were treated with chemotherapy. Of patients receiving chemotherapy, a higher proportion of mixed lymphoma and DLBCL patients received anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy regimens compared with MALT lymphoma (73% vs 71% vs 8%) whereas the proportion of mixed lymphoma and DLBCL patients was similar (p = 0.919). At a median follow-up of 37 months, the 5-year overall survival was 66.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 78% for MALT lymphoma, 84% for mixed lymphoma, and 45% for DLBCL. On univariate analysis, DLBCL histology, age, performance status, serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, bone marrow, number of extranodal sites, stage, and IPI score were prognostic for inferior survival. On multivariate analysis, DLBCL histology remained significantly prognostic for inferior survival, independent of chemotherapy regimen (hazard ratio (HR) 6.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.01-21.41, p = 0.001). Mixed histology was not prognostic for inferior survival (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.28-4.54, p = 0.868). Other factors prognostic for inferior survival were serum albumin <37 g/L (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.11-13.22, p = 0.034) and treatment with non-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone chemotherapy (HR 4.89, 95% CI 1.67-14.36, p = 0.004). In conclusion, the clinical characteristics of mixed histology MALT lymphoma are similar to low-grade MALT lymphoma and significantly different from pure DLBCL. The prognosis of mixed histology MALT lymphoma is significantly better than pure DLBCL, independent of IPI and chemotherapy regimen, and pure DLBCL histology is independently prognostic of inferior survival outcome.