Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 8:9:119.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-119.

Minimum joint space width and tibial cartilage morphology in the knees of healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study

Karen A Beattie  1 , Jeffrey Duryea, Margaret Pui, John O'Neill, Pauline Boulos, Colin E Webber, Felix Eckstein, Jonathan D Adachi
Affiliations

Minimum joint space width and tibial cartilage morphology in the knees of healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study

Karen A Beattie et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. .

Abstract

Background: The clinical use of minimum joint space width (mJSW) and cartilage volume and thickness has been limited to the longitudinal measurement of disease progression (i.e. change over time) rather than the diagnosis of OA in which values are compared to a standard. This is primarily due to lack of establishment of normative values of joint space width and cartilage morphometry as has been done with bone density values in diagnosing osteoporosis. Thus, the purpose of this pilot study is to estimate reference values of medial joint space width and cartilage morphometry in healthy individuals of all ages using standard radiography and peripheral magnetic resonance imaging.

Design: For this cross-sectional study, healthy volunteers underwent a fixed-flexion knee X-ray and a peripheral MR (pMR) scan of the same knee using a 1T machine (ONI OrthOne, Wilmington, MA). Radiographs were digitized and analyzed for medial mJSW using an automated algorithm. Only knees scoring <or=1 on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (no radiographic evidence of knee OA) were included in the analyses. All 3D SPGRE fat-sat sagittal pMR scans were analyzed for medial tibial cartilage morphometry using a proprietary software program (Chondrometrics GmbH).

Results: Of 119 healthy participants, 73 were female and 47 were male; mean (SD) age 38.2 (13.2) years, mean BMI 25.0 (4.4) kg/m2. Minimum JSW values were calculated for each sex and decade of life. Analyses revealed mJSW did not significantly decrease with increasing decade (p > 0.05) in either sex. Females had a mean (SD) medial mJSW of 4.8 (0.7) mm compared to males with corresponding larger value of 5.7 (0.8) mm. Cartilage morphometry results showed similar trends with mean (SD) tibial cartilage volume and thickness in females of 1.50 (0.19) microL/mm2 and 1.45 (0.19) mm, respectively, and 1.77 (0.24) microL/mm2 and 1.71 (0.24) mm, respectively, in males.

Conclusion: These data suggest that medial mJSW values do not decrease with aging in healthy individuals but remain fairly constant throughout the lifespan with "healthy" values of 4.8 mm for females and 5.7 mm for males. Similar trends were seen for cartilage morphology. Results suggest there may be no need to differentiate a t-score and a z-score in OA diagnosis because cartilage thickness and JSW remain constant throughout life in the absence of OA.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A digitized radiograph analyzed for minimum joint space width using an automated computer algorithm (medial compartment on left).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Medial tibial cartilage segmented from a single sagittal slice of an MR image acquired from a healthy knee.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lawrence RC, Helmick CG, Arnett FC, Deyo RA, Felson DT, Giannini EH, Heyse SP, Hirsch R, Hochberg MC, Hunder GG, Liang MH, Pillemer SR, Steen VD, Wolfe F. Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 1998;41:778–799. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(199805)41:5<778::AID-ART4>3.0.CO;2-V. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manek NJ, Lane NE. Osteoarthritis: current concepts in diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61:1795–1804. - PubMed
    1. Lawrence RC, Hochberg MC, Kelsey JL, McDuffie FC, Medsger TA, Jr, Felts WR, Shulman LE. Estimates of the prevalence of selected arthritic and musculoskeletal diseases in the United States. J Rheumatol. 1989;16:427–441. - PubMed
    1. Peterfy CG. Imaging of the disease process. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002;14:590–596. doi: 10.1097/00002281-200209000-00020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conrozier T, Mathieu P, Piperno M, Favret H, Colson F, Vignon M, Conrozier S, Vignon E. Selection of knee radiographs for trials of structure-modifying drugs in patients with knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, longitudinal study of Lyon Schuss knee radiographs with the definition of adequate alignment of the medial tibial plateau. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1411–1417. doi: 10.1002/art.21024. - DOI - PubMed