Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun;10(3):159-66.
doi: 10.1007/s11916-006-0041-z.

Review of measures of neuropathic pain

Affiliations
Review

Review of measures of neuropathic pain

Mark P Jensen. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Eight measures of neuropathic pain exist that have been designed to discriminate neuropathic from non-neuropathic pain and detect treatment effects. The current paper describes these measures and summarizes the evidence supporting their validity. Based on the available evidence, the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Signs and Symptoms appears to have the most empirical support as a measure that distinguishes patients with and without neuropathic pain in patient samples presenting with mixed chronic pain problems. However, given the lack of overlap in measures designed for this purpose, it is likely that the validity of any one measure could be improved by incorporating items from the others. The Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS) has the most empirical support as a measure of treatment outcome, although a new measure that includes the NPS items (the Pain Quality Assessment Scale) will likely prove to be even more useful, because it includes pain descriptors common to people with neuropathic and other chronic pain conditions not included on the NPS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pain Med. 2004 Jun;5(2):187-95 - PubMed
    1. Pain. 2004 Mar;108(1-2):192-8 - PubMed
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun;32(6):407-11 - PubMed
    1. Pain. 2002 Jul;98(1-2):229-30; author reply 230-1 - PubMed
    1. Neurology. 2005 Sep 27;65(6):812-9 - PubMed