Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan;91(3):385-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2008.08.013. Epub 2008 Aug 17.

Effect of 8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin and MDMA on the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical hallucinogen DOM in rats

Affiliations

Effect of 8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin and MDMA on the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical hallucinogen DOM in rats

Nantaka Khorana et al. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2009 Jan.

Abstract

Co-administration of the 5-HT1A serotonin receptor agonist (+/-)8-hydroxy-2-(N,N-di-n-propylamino)tetralin [(+/-)8-OH DPAT] enhances the discriminative stimulus effects of the classical hallucinogen 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) in rats. In the present investigation, using Sprague-Dawley rats trained to discriminate DOM (1.0 mg/kg) from saline vehicle under a VI-15 s schedule of reinforcement, it was shown that the stimulus-enhancing actions of 8-OH DPAT are related more to its R(+)-isomer than to its S(-)-enantiomer, and that the (+/-)- and R(+)8-OH DPAT-induced effects are antagonized by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist NAN-190. (+/-)8-OH DPAT and its isomers substitute in rats trained to discriminate the designer drug N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane (MDMA; methylenedioxymethamphetamine) from vehicle indicating some similarity of effect. On this basis, it was hypothesized that MDMA might be capable of enhancing the DOM stimulus. Co-administration of MDMA with low (i.e., 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) doses of DOM resulted in greater DOM-appropriate responding than engendered by administration of DOM alone. As such, the present findings are the first to demonstrate an MDMA-induced enhancing effect on the discriminative stimulus actions of a classical hallucinogen. The results also suggest that a 5-HT1A serotonin receptor mechanism might contribute to this phenomenon.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Results (group mean ±SEM) of stimulus generalization studies conducted with DOM, (±)8-OH DPAT, and MDMA in rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Results (group mean ±SEM) of stimulus generalization studies with the optical isomers of 8-OH DPAT in rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel), and animals’ response rates (lower panel). DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results (group mean ±SEM) of (±)8-OH DPAT doses given in combination with the ED50 dose of DOM to rats (n=5) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, ED50 = responses following administration of the ED50 dose (i.e., 0.3 mg/kg) of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Results (group mean ±SEM) of selected R(+)- and S(−)8-OH DPAT doses given in combination with the ED50 dose of DOM to rats (n=5) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, ED50 = responses following administration of the ED50 dose (i.e., 0.3 mg/kg) of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Results (group mean ±SEM) of NAN-190 doses given alone (open squares) or in combination with 1.0 mg/kg of DOM (open circles) to rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Results (group mean ±SEM) of NAN-190 doses (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg) administered to animals receiving a combination of the ED50 dose of DOM plus either 0.5 mg/kg of (±)8-OH DPAT or 0.25 mg/kg of R(+)8-OH DPAT to rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. ED50 = responses following administration of the ED50 dose (i.e., 0.3 mg/kg) of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg; control percent = 98% (±1); responses/min = 5.3 (±0.8). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Results (group mean ±SEM) of MDMA doses given in combination with the ED50 dose of DOM to rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, ED50 = responses following administration of the ED50 dose (i.e., 0.3 mg/kg) of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Results (group mean ±SEM) of MDMA doses given in combination with a very low dose (i.e., 0.1 mg/kg) of DOM to rats (n=6) trained to discriminate 1.0 mg/kg of DOM from saline vehicle (upper panel). The animals’ response rates are shown in the lower panel. DOM = responses following 1.0 mg/kg of DOM, and S = responses following administration of saline vehicle. One asterisk indicates a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle. Two asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of DOM (1.0 mg/kg). Three asterisks indicate a statistically significant difference from the response of saline vehicle and DOM (1.0 mg/kg).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aguirre N, Ballaz S, Lasheras B, Del Rio J. MDMA (“Ecstasy”) enhances 5-HT1A receptor density and 8-OH DPAT-induced hypothermia: Blockade by drugs preventing 5-hydroxytryptamine depletion. Eur J Pharmacol. 1998;346:181–188. - PubMed
    1. Balster RL, Ford RD. The discriminative stimulus properties of cannabinoids: a review. In: Ho BT, Richards DW III, Chute DL, editors. Drug Discrimination and State Dependent Learning. NY, NY: Academic Press; 1978. pp. 131–147.
    1. Bishop C, Taylor JL, Kuhn DM, Eskow KL, Park JY, Walker PD. MDMA and fenfluramine reduce L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia via indirect 5-HT1A receptor stimulation. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;23:2669–2676. - PubMed
    1. Bonaventure P, Nepomuceno D, Hein L, Sutcliffe JG, Lovenberg T, Hedlund PB. Radioligand binding analysis of knockout mice reveals 5-hydroxytryptamine7 receptor distribution and uncovers 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin interaction with α2-adrenergic receptors. Neuroscience. 2004;124:901–911. - PubMed
    1. Colpaert FC. Discriminative stimulus properties of narcotic analgesic drugs. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978;9:863–887. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances