Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes
- PMID: 18779236
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0805017
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes
Abstract
Background: The value of continuous glucose monitoring in the management of type 1 diabetes mellitus has not been determined.
Methods: In a multicenter clinical trial, we randomly assigned 322 adults and children who were already receiving intensive therapy for type 1 diabetes to a group with continuous glucose monitoring or to a control group performing home monitoring with a blood glucose meter. All the patients were stratified into three groups according to age and had a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0 to 10.0%. The primary outcome was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level at 26 weeks.
Results: The changes in glycated hemoglobin levels in the two study groups varied markedly according to age group (P=0.003), with a significant difference among patients 25 years of age or older that favored the continuous-monitoring group (mean difference in change, -0.53%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.71 to -0.35; P<0.001). The between-group difference was not significant among those who were 15 to 24 years of age (mean difference, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.17 to 0.33; P=0.52) or among those who were 8 to 14 years of age (mean difference, -0.13; 95% CI, -0.38 to 0.11; P=0.29). Secondary glycated hemoglobin outcomes were better in the continuous-monitoring group than in the control group among the oldest and youngest patients but not among those who were 15 to 24 years of age. The use of continuous glucose monitoring averaged 6.0 or more days per week for 83% of patients 25 years of age or older, 30% of those 15 to 24 years of age, and 50% of those 8 to 14 years of age. The rate of severe hypoglycemia was low and did not differ between the two study groups; however, the trial was not powered to detect such a difference.
Conclusions: Continuous glucose monitoring can be associated with improved glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes. Further work is needed to identify barriers to effectiveness of continuous monitoring in children and adolescents. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00406133.)
2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
Comment in
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and type 1 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):190; author reply 191-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc082243. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19129536 No abstract available.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring and type 1 diabetes.N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 8;360(2):191; author reply 191-2. N Engl J Med. 2009. PMID: 19137629 No abstract available.
-
How effective is continuous glucose monitoring in intensively treated type 1 diabetes mellitus?Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Mar;5(3):134-5. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet1071. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab. 2009. PMID: 19229230
-
Continuous glucose monitoring improved glucose control in adults but not in young adults or children with type 1 diabetes.Evid Based Nurs. 2009 Apr;12(2):44. doi: 10.1136/ebn.12.2.44. Evid Based Nurs. 2009. PMID: 19321821 No abstract available.
-
Reinforcing healthy behaviors: is there a role for CGM?Curr Diab Rep. 2009 Jun;9(3):183-4. doi: 10.1007/s11892-009-0029-2. Curr Diab Rep. 2009. PMID: 19490817 No abstract available.
-
Continuous glucose monitoring study does not demonstrate benefit in children and adolescents.J Pediatr. 2009 Mar;154(3):463-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.047. J Pediatr. 2009. PMID: 19874771 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical