The "number needed to treat" turns 20--and continues to be used and misused
- PMID: 18779528
- PMCID: PMC2527399
- DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.080484
The "number needed to treat" turns 20--and continues to be used and misused
Comment in
-
Number needed to treat and baseline risks.CMAJ. 2008 Nov 18;179(11):1174. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1080110. CMAJ. 2008. PMID: 19015570 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS. An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 1988;318:1728-33. - PubMed
-
- Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA 2001;285:1987-91;9:30. - PubMed
-
- Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1997.
-
- Kumana CR, Cheung BMY, Lauder IJ. Gauging the impact of statins using number needed to treat. JAMA 1999;282:1899-901. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical