Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Sep-Oct;6(5):428-34.
doi: 10.1370/afm.857.

Accuracy of primary care clinicians in screening for diabetic retinopathy using single-image retinal photography

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Accuracy of primary care clinicians in screening for diabetic retinopathy using single-image retinal photography

Tillman F Farley et al. Ann Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Diabetic patients with limited access to ophthalmologists have low screening rates for diabetic retinopathy. We evaluated a diabetic retinopathy screening program in a community health center using single images taken with a nonmydriatic retinal camera and primary care clinicians trained to read retinal images.

Methods: This study was conducted from 2001 to 2004 in a multisite community health center staffed by family physicians, advanced practice nurses, and physician's assistants. The clinic serves a primarily low-income, Hispanic population. Clinic clinicians were trained to read the retinal photographs. All images were overread by an ophthalmologist. Patients were referred to eye care specialists for severe diabetic retinopathy, unknown or other abnormality, or inadequate photographs. We analyzed agreement between the clinicians and the ophthalmologist in recognizing diabetic retinopathy and in determining which patients needed referral. We also analyzed overall screening rates based on clinic access to the camera.

Results: One thousand forty diabetic patients were screened for diabetic retinopathy at the health center. One hundred thirteen (10.9%) were found to have diabetic retinopathy, 46 severe enough to warrant referral to an ophthalmologist. The clinicians failed to refer 35 (10.2%) of the 344 patients the ophthalmologist believed needed referral. Most cases of missed referral were due to failure to recognize an inadequate photograph or for abnormalities other than diabetic retinopathy. Screening rates were better in the clinic with a permanent camera.

Conclusions: Primary care clinicians trained to read single images from a retinal camera have acceptable accuracy in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Further training may be necessary to recognize other common abnormalities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Harris MI. Diabetes in America: epidemiology and scope of the problem. Diabetes Care. 1998;21(suppl 3):C11–C14. - PubMed
    1. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Diabetes trends in the US: 1990–i998. Diabetes Care. 2000;23(9):1278–1283. - PubMed
    1. Varma R. Diabetic retinopathy: challenges and future directions. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141(3):539–541. - PubMed
    1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: the Diabetes Control and Complications Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–986. - PubMed
    1. Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with Type II diabetes. Lancet. 1998;352(9178):839–855. - PubMed

Publication types