Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 9;3(9):e3167.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003167.

Dynamic spatial coding within the dorsal frontoparietal network during a visual search task

Affiliations

Dynamic spatial coding within the dorsal frontoparietal network during a visual search task

Wieland H Sommer et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

To what extent are the left and right visual hemifields spatially coded in the dorsal frontoparietal attention network? In many experiments with neglect patients, the left hemisphere shows a contralateral hemifield preference, whereas the right hemisphere represents both hemifields. This pattern of spatial coding is often used to explain the right-hemispheric dominance of lesions causing hemispatial neglect. However, pathophysiological mechanisms of hemispatial neglect are controversial because recent experiments on healthy subjects produced conflicting results regarding the spatial coding of visual hemifields. We used an fMRI paradigm that allowed us to distinguish two attentional subprocesses during a visual search task. Either within the left or right hemifield subjects first attended to stationary locations (spatial orienting) and then shifted their attentional focus to search for a target line. Dynamic changes in spatial coding of the left and right hemifields were observed within subregions of the dorsal front-parietal network: During stationary spatial orienting, we found the well-known spatial pattern described above, with a bilateral hemifield representation in the right hemisphere and a contralateral preference in the left hemisphere. However, during search, the right hemisphere had a contralateral preference and the left hemisphere equally represented both hemifields. This finding leads to novel perspectives regarding models of visuospatial attention and hemispatial neglect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Paradigm separating spatial orienting (SO) and visual search (VS).
After a fixation period, a central cue indicated the relevant hemifield for the next trial. When stimuli appeared, subjects had to search covertly for a target line among the 6 positions of the cued hemifield. Task difficulty was modified by the number of distractors with nonvertical orientations in the relevant hemifield (easy: 2; difficult: 5).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Contralateral preference of activated voxels during spatial orienting (SO) and visual search (VS).
Contralateral preference visualized by t-tests for all voxels activated by SO and VS (p<0.005, RFX, cluster threshold: 50 mm2). Negative (red) and positive (blue) t-values indicate a preference for the left and right hemifield, respectively. Voxels with t-values<−2.26 or >2.26 show a significant contralateral preference (p<0.05) and are indicated by dark blue or red, respectively. White color indicates voxels involved in the process with no preference for either hemifield. (a) Histograms with t-values for all activated voxels within predefined ROIs of the dorsal FPN. The range of t-values represented by each bar is 1.13. The significance level (p<0.05) for contralateral preference to the left (−) or right (+) is indicated by black lines on the x-axis of each histogram. Additionally, the percentage of voxels with a significant contralateral preference for the left or right hemifield is shown on the appropriate side of the histograms. (b) Dorsal posterior view of the flattened left and right hemisphere with representation of t-values on the surface. (c) Histograms with t-values for all activated voxels within control ROIs MC (motor cortex) and VO (visual occipital). T: mean t-value of activated voxels; STD: standard deviation of t-values; Yellow dotted lines: predefined anatomical ROIs.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Contralateral preference of activated voxels during easy and difficult search conditions.
Contralateral preference visualized by t-tests for all voxels activated by easy search and difficult search conditions (p<0.005, RFX, cluster threshold: 50 mm2). The color convention and the significance level for hemifield preference are described in Fig. 2. (a) Histograms with t-values for all activated voxels within predefined ROIs of the dorsal FPN. The range of t-values represented by each bar is 1.13. The significance level (p<0.05) for contralateral preference to the left (−) or right (+) is indicated by black lines on the x-axis of each histogram. As in Figure 2, the percentage of voxels with a significant contralateral preference for the left or right hemifield is given on the appropriate side of the histograms. (b) Dorsal posterior view of the flattened left and right hemisphere with representation of t-values on the surface. (c) Histograms with t-values for all activated voxels within control ROIs MC (motor cortex) and VO (visual occipital). T: mean t-value of activated voxels; STD: standard deviation of t-values; Yellow dotted lines: predefined anatomical ROIs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Danckert JA, Goodale MA. Ups and Downs in the Visual Control of Actions. In: Johnson-Frey SH, editor. Taking Action: Cognitive Neuroscience Perspectives onIntentional Actions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003. pp. 29–64.
    1. Hemond CC, Kanwisher NG, Op de Beeck HP. A preference for contralateral stimuli in human object- and face-selective cortex. PLoS ONE. 2007;2:e574. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Niemeier M, Goltz HC, Kuchinad A, Tweed DB, Vilis T. A contralateral preference in the lateral occipital area: sensory and attentional mechanisms. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15:325–331. - PubMed
    1. Mesulam MM. Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999;354:1325–1346. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Corbetta M, Shulman GL. Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3:201–215. - PubMed

Publication types