This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 2008 Aug;2(4):393.

doi: 10.5489/cuaj.837.

The gold standard for the treatment of uncomplicated adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Affiliations

PMID: 18781213
PMCID: PMC2532548
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.837

The gold standard for the treatment of uncomplicated adult ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Patrick Luke. Can Urol Assoc J. 2008 Aug.

. 2008 Aug;2(4):393.

doi: 10.5489/cuaj.837.

Author

Affiliation

¹ Associate Professor of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London Health Sciences Centre, University Hospital, London, Ont.

PMID: 18781213
PMCID: PMC2532548
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.837

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP, Grubb RL 3rd, Rehman J, Yan Y, Chen C, Landman J, McDougall EM, Clayman RV. Sundaram CP, et al. J Urol. 2003 Jun;169(6):2037-40. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000067180.78134.da. J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12771713
Candidate urinary biomarker discovery in ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a proteomic approach.
Mesrobian HG, Mitchell ME, See WA, Halligan BD, Carlson BE, Greene AS, Wakim BT. Mesrobian HG, et al. J Urol. 2010 Aug;184(2):709-14. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.061. J Urol. 2010. PMID: 20639044
Ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair: when, how, what?
Tan BJ, Smith AD. Tan BJ, et al. Curr Opin Urol. 2004 Mar;14(2):55-9. doi: 10.1097/00042307-200403000-00002. Curr Opin Urol. 2004. PMID: 15075831 Review.
Equivocal ureteropelvic junction obstruction on diuretic renogram--should minimally invasive pyeloplasty be offered to symptomatic patients?
Ozayar A, Friedlander JI, Shakir NA, Gahan JC, Cadeddu JA, Morgan MS. Ozayar A, et al. J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1278-82. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.10.100. Epub 2014 Oct 30. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25444983
The kidney in congenital ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a spectrum from normal to nephrectomy.
Rosen S, Peters CA, Chevalier RL, Huang WY. Rosen S, et al. J Urol. 2008 Apr;179(4):1257-63. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.048. Epub 2008 Feb 20. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18280506 Review.

See all similar articles

References

1. Hussain A, Whelan P, Piercey K, et al. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Can J Urol. 2004;11:2299–302. - PubMed
1. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases. J Urol. 2002;167:1253–6. - PubMed
1. Calvert RC, Morsy MM, Zelhof B, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in 100 patients with pelviureteric junction obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:411–4. - PubMed
1. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G, et al. Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol. 2003;44:340–5. - PubMed
1. Soulié M, Thoulouzan M, Seguin P, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty with a minimal incision: comparison of two surgical approaches. Urology. 2001;57:443–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources