Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;29(8):1537-43.
doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1168.

Caudate nucleus volumes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: differential atrophy in subtypes

Affiliations

Caudate nucleus volumes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: differential atrophy in subtypes

J C L Looi et al. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

Background and purpose: Frontostriatal circuits involving the caudate nucleus have been implicated in frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). We assessed caudate nucleus volumetrics in FTLD and subtypes: frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 12), semantic dementia (SD, n = 13), and progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA, n = 9) in comparison with healthy controls (n = 27) and subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD, n = 19).

Materials and methods: Diagnoses were based on accepted clinical criteria. Manual volume measurement of the head and body of the caudate, excluding the tail, was conducted on T1-weighted brain MR imaging scans, using a published protocol, by a single analyst blinded to the diagnosis.

Results: Paired t tests (P < .05) showed that the right caudate nucleus volume was significantly larger than the left in controls and PNFA. No hemispheric asymmetry was found in AD, FTD, and SD. Across the groups, there was a positive partial correlation between the left caudate nucleus volume and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores (r = 0.393, n = 76, P = .001) with higher left caudate volumes associated with higher MMSE scores. Multivariate analysis of covariance was used to assess the statistical significance between the subject groups (AD, FTD, SD, PNFA, and controls) as independent variables and raw right/left caudate volumes at the within-subject level (covariates: age and intracranial volume; P < .05). Control volume was largest, followed by AD (93% of control volume), SD (92%), PNFA (79%), and FTD (75%).

Conclusions: Volume of the head and body of the caudate nucleus differs in subtypes of FTLD, due to differential frontostriatal dysfunction in subtypes being reflected in structural change in the caudate, and is correlated with cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
Views of the traced caudate nucleus and 3D reconstruction. Images from top left, clockwise: axial view, sagittal view, coronal view, and 3D reconstruction of the caudate.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Schroeter ML, Razcka K, Neumann J, et al. Towards a nosology for frontotemporal lobar degenerations: a meta-analysis involving 267 subjects. Neuroimage 2007;36:497–510 - PubMed
    1. Leh SE, Ptito A, Chakravaty MM, et al. Fronto-striatal connections in the human brain: a probabilistic diffusion tractography study. Neurosci Lett 2007;419:113–18 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Postuma RB, Dagher A. Basal ganglia functional connectivity based on a meta-analysis of 126 positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging publications. Cereb Cortex 2007;16:1508–21 - PubMed
    1. von Braunmühl A, Picksche K. In: Bumke O, ed. Handbuch der Geisteskrankheiten. Vol. 11. Part VII. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag;1930. :673–715
    1. von Bagh K. Klinische und pathologisch-anatomische Studien an 30 Fällen systematischer umschriebener Atrophie der Grosshirnrinde (Pickscher Krankheit): Annales Academiae Scientiarum Fennicae—Series A. V. Medica Anthropologica Helsinki. Helsinki, Finland: Suomalaisen Tiedeakatemia;1946

Publication types