Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study
- PMID: 18783864
- DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.08.004
Brain correlates of aesthetic expertise: a parametric fMRI study
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated that acquired expertise influences aesthetic judgments. In this paradigm we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study aesthetic judgments of visually presented architectural stimuli and control-stimuli (faces) for a group of architects and a group of non-architects. This design allowed us to test whether level of expertise modulates neural activity in brain areas associated with either perceptual processing, memory, or reward processing. We show that experts and non-experts recruit bilateral medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and subcallosal cingulate gyrus differentially during aesthetic judgment, even in the absence of behavioural aesthetic rating differences between experts and non-experts. By contrast, activity in nucleus accumbens (NAcc) exhibits a differential response profile compared to OFC and subcallosal cingulate gyrus, suggesting a dissociable role between these regions in the reward processing of expertise. Finally, categorical responses (irrespective of aesthetic ratings) resulted in expertise effects in memory-related areas such as hippocampus and precuneus. These results highlight the fact that expertise not only modulates cognitive processing, but also modulates the response in reward related brain areas.
Similar articles
-
Self-referential processing of negative stimuli within the ventral anterior cingulate gyrus and right amygdala.Brain Cogn. 2009 Feb;69(1):218-25. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2008.07.010. Epub 2008 Aug 23. Brain Cogn. 2009. PMID: 18723260
-
Differential influences of emotion, task, and novelty on brain regions underlying the processing of speech melody.J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Jul;21(7):1255-68. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21099. J Cogn Neurosci. 2009. PMID: 18752404
-
Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty.Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):276-85. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010. Epub 2005 Aug 8. Neuroimage. 2006. PMID: 16087351 Clinical Trial.
-
[Neural substrates underlying cognitive expertise].Brain Nerve. 2008 Mar;60(3):257-62. Brain Nerve. 2008. PMID: 18402073 Review. Japanese.
-
Towards a framework for the study of the neural correlates of aesthetic preference.Spat Vis. 2008;21(3-5):379-96. doi: 10.1163/156856808784532653. Spat Vis. 2008. PMID: 18534110 Review.
Cited by
-
Reappraising abstract paintings after exposure to background information.PLoS One. 2015 May 6;10(5):e0124159. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124159. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25945789 Free PMC article.
-
Difference in brain activations during appreciating paintings and photographic analogs.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Jul 7;8:478. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00478. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 25071508 Free PMC article.
-
Hemispheric asymmetry of liking for representational and abstract paintings.Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1934-1942. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1390-9. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018. PMID: 29030757
-
Assessing the association between subjective evaluation of space qualities and physiological responses through cinematic environments' emotion-eliciting stimuli.Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 12;13:1012758. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1012758. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 36710787 Free PMC article.
-
Expertise reduces neural cost but does not modulate repetition suppression.Cogn Neurosci. 2011 Mar;2(1):57-65. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2010.525628. Epub 2010 Oct 19. Cogn Neurosci. 2011. PMID: 21479254 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources