The cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*5701 genetic screening to guide initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV
- PMID: 18784465
- PMCID: PMC2648845
- DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283103ce6
The cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*5701 genetic screening to guide initial antiretroviral therapy for HIV
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of HLA-B*5701 testing to guide selection of first-line HIV regimens in the United States.
Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis using a simulation model of HIV disease. The prevalence of HLA-B*5701 and the probabilities of confirmed and unconfirmed severe systemic hypersensitivity reaction among patients taking abacavir testing HLA-B*5701 positive and negative were from the Prospective Randomized Evaluation of DNA Screening in a Clinical Trial study. The monthly costs of abacavir-based and tenofovir-based regimens were $1135 and $1139, respectively; similar virologic efficacy was assumed and this assumption was varied in sensitivity analysis.
Patients: Simulated cohort of patients initiating HIV therapy.
Interventions: The interventions are first-line abacavir, lamivudine, and efavirenz without pretreatment HLA-B*5701 testing; the same regimen with HLA-B*5701 testing; and first-line tenofovir, emtricitabine, and efavirenz.
Main outcome measures: Quality-adjusted life years and lifetime medical costs discounted at 3% per annum, cost-effectiveness ratios ($/QALY).
Results: Abacavir-based treatment without HLA-B*5701 testing resulted in a projected 30.93 years life expectancy, 16.23 discounted quality-adjusted life years, and $472,200 discounted lifetime cost per person. HLA-B*5701 testing added 0.04 quality-adjusted months at an incremental cost of $110, resulting in a cost-effectiveness ratio of $36,700/QALY compared with no testing. Initiating treatment with a tenofovir-based regimen increased costs without improving quality-adjusted life expectancy. HLA-B*5701 testing remained the preferred strategy only if abacavir-based treatment had equal efficacy and cost less per month than tenofovir-based treatment. Results were also sensitive to the cost of HLA-B*5701 testing and the prevalence of HLA-B*5701.
Conclusion: Pharmacogenetic testing for HLA-B*5701 is cost-effective only if abacavir-based treatment is as effective and costs less than tenofovir-based treatment.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Economic efficiency of genetic screening to inform the use of abacavir sulfate in the treatment of HIV.Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(11):1025-39. doi: 10.2165/11535540-000000000-00000. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010. PMID: 20575592
-
Cost-effectiveness of nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor pairs in efavirenz-based regimens for treatment-naïve adults with HIV infection in the United States.Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):657-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.009. Epub 2011 Jun 12. Value Health. 2011. PMID: 21839403
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA B*5701 genotyping in preventing abacavir hypersensitivity.Pharmacogenetics. 2004 Jun;14(6):335-42. doi: 10.1097/00008571-200406000-00002. Pharmacogenetics. 2004. PMID: 15247625
-
Abacavir pharmacogenetics--from initial reports to standard of care.Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Jul;33(7):765-75. doi: 10.1002/phar.1278. Epub 2013 May 3. Pharmacotherapy. 2013. PMID: 23649914 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Studies on abacavir-induced hypersensitivity reaction: a successful example of translation of pharmacogenetics to personalized medicine.Sci China Life Sci. 2013 Feb;56(2):119-24. doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4438-8. Epub 2013 Feb 8. Sci China Life Sci. 2013. PMID: 23393027 Review.
Cited by
-
Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Dec;112(6):1318-1328. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2754. Epub 2022 Oct 9. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2022. PMID: 36149409 Free PMC article.
-
Promises and challenges of pharmacogenetics: an overview of study design, methodological and statistical issues.JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2012 Apr 5;1(1):cvd.2012.012001. doi: 10.1258/cvd.2012.012001. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2012. PMID: 24175062 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Genetic Testing in Clinical Settings.Am J Kidney Dis. 2018 Oct;72(4):569-581. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.02.351. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018. PMID: 29655499 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pharmacogenomics.Lancet. 2019 Aug 10;394(10197):521-532. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31276-0. Epub 2019 Aug 5. Lancet. 2019. PMID: 31395440 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Successful translation of pharmacogenetics into the clinic: the abacavir example.Mol Diagn Ther. 2009;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03256308. Mol Diagn Ther. 2009. PMID: 19351209 Review.
References
-
- Castillo SA, Hernandez JE, Brothers CH. Long-term safety and tolerability of the lamivudine/abacavir combination as components of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Drug Saf. 2006;29:811–826. - PubMed
-
- Hetherington S, McGuirk S, Powell G, Cutrell A, Naderer O, Spreen B, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions during therapy with the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor abacavir. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1603–1614. - PubMed
-
- Hetherington S, Hughes AR, Mosteller M, Shortino D, Baker KL, Spreen W, et al. Genetic variations in HLA-B region and hypersensitivity reactions to abacavir. Lancet. 2002;359:1121–1122. - PubMed
-
- Rauch A, Nolan D, Martin A, McKinnon E, Almeida C, Mallal S. Prospective genetic screening decreases the incidence of abacavir hypersensitivity reactions in the Western Australian HIV cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:99–102. - PubMed
-
- Mallal S, Phillips E, Carosi G, Molina JM, Workman C, Tomazic J, et al. HLA-B*5701 Screening for Hypersensitivity to Abacavir. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:568–579. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials