On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models
- PMID: 18784976
- DOI: 10.1007/s10822-008-9240-5
On the interpretation and interpretability of quantitative structure-activity relationship models
Abstract
The goal of a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model is to encode the relationship between molecular structure and biological activity or physical property. Based on this encoding, such models can be used for predictive purposes. Assuming the use of relevant and meaningful descriptors, and a statistically significant model, extraction of the encoded structure-activity relationships (SARs) can provide insight into what makes a molecule active or inactive. Such analyses by QSAR models are useful in a number of scenarios, such as suggesting structural modifications to enhance activity, explanation of outliers and exploratory analysis of novel SARs. In this paper we discuss the need for interpretation and an overview of the factors that affect interpretability of QSAR models. We then describe interpretation protocols for different types of models, highlighting the different types of interpretations, ranging from very broad, global, trends to very specific, case-by-case, descriptions of the SAR, using examples from the training set. Finally, we discuss a number of case studies where workers have provide some form of interpretation of a QSAR model.
Similar articles
-
QSAR using evolved neural networks for the inhibition of mutant PfDHFR by pyrimethamine derivatives.Biosystems. 2008 Apr;92(1):10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.10.005. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Biosystems. 2008. PMID: 18160210
-
Free energy force field (FEFF) 3D-QSAR analysis of a set of Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase inhibitors.J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001 Sep;15(9):787-810. doi: 10.1023/a:1013199108020. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2001. PMID: 11776291
-
Quantitative structure-activity relationships by evolved neural networks for the inhibition of dihydrofolate reductase by pyrimidines.Biosystems. 2002 Feb;65(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/s0303-2647(01)00192-7. Biosystems. 2002. PMID: 11888662
-
Modelling and informatics in the analysis of P. falciparum DHFR enzyme inhibitors.Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(16):1552-69. doi: 10.2174/092986708784911551. Curr Med Chem. 2008. PMID: 18673224 Review.
-
Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships of Aquatic Narcosis: A Review.Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2018;14(1):7-28. doi: 10.2174/1573409913666170711130304. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2018. PMID: 28699497 Review.
Cited by
-
QSAR modeling: where have you been? Where are you going to?J Med Chem. 2014 Jun 26;57(12):4977-5010. doi: 10.1021/jm4004285. Epub 2014 Jan 6. J Med Chem. 2014. PMID: 24351051 Free PMC article.
-
Multi-Target Chemometric Modelling, Fragment Analysis and Virtual Screening with ERK Inhibitors as Potential Anticancer Agents.Molecules. 2019 Oct 30;24(21):3909. doi: 10.3390/molecules24213909. Molecules. 2019. PMID: 31671605 Free PMC article.
-
Deep-learning: investigating deep neural networks hyper-parameters and comparison of performance to shallow methods for modeling bioactivity data.J Cheminform. 2017 Jun 28;9(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13321-017-0226-y. J Cheminform. 2017. PMID: 29086090 Free PMC article.
-
Development of Multi-Target Chemometric Models for the Inhibition of Class I PI3K Enzyme Isoforms: A Case Study Using QSAR-Co Tool.Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Aug 27;20(17):4191. doi: 10.3390/ijms20174191. Int J Mol Sci. 2019. PMID: 31461863 Free PMC article.
-
Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Toxicological Sciences.Toxicol Sci. 2022 Aug 25;189(1):7-19. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfac075. Toxicol Sci. 2022. PMID: 35861448 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous