Factors affecting post minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting incidence of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality of cardiac origin
- PMID: 18786942
- DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.185280
Factors affecting post minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting incidence of myocardial infarction, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary artery bypass grafting and mortality of cardiac origin
Abstract
In the present study we identify parameters which influence the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and cardiac mortality after minimal invasive coronary artery bypass grafting (MIDCABG). With a mean follow-up of 30+/-11.2 months, 390 patients were assessed with Wald test-corrected chi(2) analysis to identify preoperative factors which correlate with a higher incidence of post-MIDCABG MI, PCI, CABG and mortality from cardiac causes. We found an increased incidence of postoperative MI in patients with 2-vessel (8.7%) and 3-vessel (7.7%) vs. 1.3% 1-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) (P=0.023), and in patients with preceding cardiac procedure (CABG and PCI: 8.4% vs. 2.0% without, P=0.023). Also diabetes was associated with higher post-MIDCABG frequency of MI (P=0.035). Severity of angina was associated with lesser post-MIDCAB-PCI (P=0.011) while preceding CABG predicted a higher incidence (P=0.012). Preoperative low ejection fraction (EF) (multivariate, P<0.001), preoperative MI (P=0.007) and extent of CAD (P=0.001) were associated with a higher post-MIDCABG mortality. None of the parameters correlated with subsequent CABG MIDCABG. The extent and history of CAD, history of cardiac interventions and low EF seem to influence the outcome adversely and should be considered deciding pro or against the MIDCAB-option.
Similar articles
-
Clinical characteristics and early mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting compared to percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ASCTS) and the Melbourne Interventional Group (MIG) Registries.Heart Lung Circ. 2009 Jun;18(3):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2008.10.005. Epub 2009 Mar 5. Heart Lung Circ. 2009. PMID: 19268632
-
Impact of multivessel coronary artery disease on outcome after isolated minimally invasive bypass grafting of the left anterior descending artery.Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Aug;78(2):487-91. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2003.11.044. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15276503 Review.
-
Increased mortality and perioperative complications in patients with previous elective percutaneous coronary interventions undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;137(4):846-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.041. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009. PMID: 19327507
-
Coronary angioplasty versus repeat coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with previous bypass surgery.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Nov 1;28(5):1140-6. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(96)00286-0. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996. PMID: 8890807
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery for cardiogenic shock and multivessel coronary artery disease?Am Heart J. 2010 Jan;159(1):141-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.10.035. Am Heart J. 2010. PMID: 20102880 Review.
Cited by
-
Perioperative outcomes in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus off-pump coronary artery bypass with sternotomy.Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017 Sep;12(3):285-290. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2017.67679. Epub 2017 May 12. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2017. PMID: 29062450 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous