Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 May;29(2):63-70.

Low level environmental lead exposure--a continuing challenge

Affiliations

Low level environmental lead exposure--a continuing challenge

Enrico Rossi. Clin Biochem Rev. 2008 May.

Abstract

The current threshold for lead toxicity, defined as a blood lead level of 10 microg/dL, was adopted by the United States (US) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 1991 and the World Health Organization in 1995. Since that time, adverse health outcomes at blood lead levels below this threshold have been well demonstrated. Most concern probably relates to children of pre-school age; an international pooled analysis has demonstrated lead-associated intellectual deficits at blood lead levels well below 10 microg/dL. In the case of adults, several convincing population studies have shown a positive association between blood lead and risk of death. The largest such study compared mortality information from participants with blood lead levels in the highest third of the blood lead distribution (3.6 microg/dL or greater) with those in the lowest third (less than 1.9 microg/dL). After adjustment for potential confounders, estimates of the excess risk were 25% for all cause mortality and 55% for cardiovascular mortality. The adverse consequences of lead exposure have no discernible blood lead threshold, implying there is no safety margin at existing exposure levels. Despite marked declines in population mean blood lead levels since 1980, low level environmental lead exposure remains a significant public health concern.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean blood lead levels by age group and gender from 1839 Esperance adults, 676 males [▴] and 1163 females[▪]. Preliminary data from participants in the Esperance Blood Lead Survey 2007.

References

    1. Flegal AR, Smith DR. Lead levels in preindustrial humans. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1293–4. - PubMed
    1. Davis JJ, Gulson BL. Ceiling (attic) dust: a “museum” of contamination and potential hazard. Environ Res. 2005;99:177–94. - PubMed
    1. Mattel issues third recall. [(Accessed 21 February 2008)]. http://www.choice.com.au/viewArticle.aspx?id=105951&catId=100570&tid=100....
    1. Baghurst PA, McMichael AJ, Wigg NR, Vimpani GV, Robertson EF, Roberts RJ, et al. Environmental exposure to lead and children’s intelligence at the age of seven years. The Port Pirie Cohort Study. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1279–84. - PubMed
    1. Gulson BL, Davis JJ, Mizon KJ, Korsch MJ, Law AJ, Howarth D. Lead bioavailability in the environment of children: blood lead levels in children can be elevated in a mining community. Arch Environ Health. 1994;49:326–31. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources