Similar articles

• Treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias with intravenous calcium channel blockers: are subtle differences worth the cost?

  Cheiman DM, Shea BF, Kelly RA. Cheiman DM, et al. Pharmacotherapy. 1996 Sep-Oct;16(5):861-8. Pharmacotherapy. 1996. PMID: 8888080 Review.
• [Treatment of paroxysmal forms of supraventricular tachycardia with falikard].

  Milanov S, Brankov Kh, Kraeva M, Koev P. Milanov S, et al. Kardiologiia. 1987 May;27(5):95-6. Kardiologiia. 1987. PMID: 3656903 Russian. No abstract available.
• [Electrophysiologic effects of calcium channel blockers on supraventricular tachycardia in children].

  Fujino H, Fujiseki Y, Shimada M. Fujino H, et al. J Cardiol. 1989 Mar;19(1):307-15. J Cardiol. 1989. PMID: 2810047 Japanese.
• Adenosine vs. calcium channel blockers for supraventricular tachycardia.

  Anugwom C, Sulangi S, Dachs R. Anugwom C, et al. Am Fam Physician. 2007 Jun 1;75(11):1653-4. Am Fam Physician. 2007. PMID: 17575655 Review. No abstract available.
• Slow infusion of calcium channel blockers compared with intravenous adenosine in the emergency treatment of supraventricular tachycardia.

  Lim SH, Anantharaman V, Teo WS, Chan YH. Lim SH, et al. Resuscitation. 2009 May;80(5):523-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.01.017. Epub 2009 Mar 3. Resuscitation. 2009. PMID: 19261367 Clinical Trial.