Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults
- PMID: 18792110
- DOI: 10.1179/cim.2002.3.1.29
Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare melody recognition and pitch perception of adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults and to identify factors that influence the ability of implant users to recognize familiar melodies. Forty-nine experienced cochlear implant recipients and 18 normal-hearing adults were tested on familiar melody recognition. The normal-hearing adults were significantly (p < 0.0001) more accurate than implant recipients. Implant recipients showed considerable variability in perception of complex tones and pure tones. There were significant negative correlations between melody recognition, age at the time of testing, length of profound deafness and complex-tone perception, and significant positive relations between melody recognition and speech recognition scores.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise.Ear Hear. 2007 Jun;28(3):412-23. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479318. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17485990
-
Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children.Cochlear Implants Int. 2005 Sep;6(3):123-40. doi: 10.1179/cim.2005.6.3.123. Cochlear Implants Int. 2005. PMID: 18792330
-
Recognition of "real-world" musical excerpts by cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults.Ear Hear. 2005 Jun;26(3):237-50. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200506000-00001. Ear Hear. 2005. PMID: 15937406
-
Cochlear implant melody recognition as a function of melody frequency range, harmonicity, and number of electrodes.Ear Hear. 2009 Apr;30(2):160-8. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31819342b9. Ear Hear. 2009. PMID: 19194298 Free PMC article.
-
Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.Ear Hear. 2008 Jun;29(3):421-34. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816a0d0b. Ear Hear. 2008. PMID: 18344870
Cited by
-
Person-centered aural rehabilitation program improved mood, cognition, and auditory processing in a professional musician who uses a hearing aid and cochlear implant: Case Report.Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Aug 7;5:1399424. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1399424. eCollection 2024. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024. PMID: 39169923 Free PMC article.
-
Residual neural processing of musical sound features in adult cochlear implant users.Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Apr 3;8:181. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00181. eCollection 2014. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014. PMID: 24772074 Free PMC article.
-
Can Haptic Stimulation Enhance Music Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners?Front Neurosci. 2021 Aug 31;15:723877. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.723877. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34531717 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integration of acoustic and electric hearing is better in the same ear than across ears.Sci Rep. 2017 Oct 2;7(1):12500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12298-3. Sci Rep. 2017. PMID: 28970567 Free PMC article.
-
Melodic interval perception with acoustic and electric hearing in bimodal and single-sided deaf cochlear implant listeners.Hear Res. 2021 Feb;400:108136. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2020.108136. Epub 2020 Nov 29. Hear Res. 2021. PMID: 33310263 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical