Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Dec;43(6):1931-51.
doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2008.00899.x. Epub 2008 Sep 11.

Does competition improve health care quality?

Dennis P Scanlon  1 , Shailender Swaminathan, Woolton Lee, Michael Chernew
Affiliations

Does competition improve health care quality?

Dennis P Scanlon et al. Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the effect of competition on health maintenance organizations' (HMOs) quality measures.

Study design: Longitudinal analysis of a 5-year panel of the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) and Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Survey(R) (CAHPS) data (calendar years 1998-2002). All plans submitting data to the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) were included regardless of their decision to allow NCQA to disclose their results publicly.

Data sources: NCQA, Interstudy, the Area Resource File, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

Methods: Fixed-effects models were estimated that relate HMO competition to HMO quality controlling for an unmeasured, time-invariant plan, and market traits. Results are compared with estimates from models reliant on cross-sectional variation.

Principal findings: Estimates suggest that plan quality does not improve with increased levels of HMO competition (as measured by either the Herfindahl index or the number of HMOs). Similarly, increased HMO penetration is generally not associated with improved quality. Cross-sectional models tend to suggest an inverse relationship between competition and quality.

Conclusions: The strategies that promote competition among HMOs in the current market setting may not lead to improved HMO quality. It is possible that price competition dominates, with purchasers and consumers preferring lower premiums at the expense of improved quality, as measured by HEDIS and CAHPS. It is also possible that the fragmentation associated with competition hinders quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Change in HMO HHI*, Number of HMOs* and HMO Penetration* 1998–2002 (N=167) *Computed at the plan level and weighted for MSA level enrollment for plans serving multiple MSAs Monopoly=1 for the HHI measure
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baker L C. Measuring Competition in Health Care Markets. Health Services Research. 2001;36(1, part 2):223–51. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumol W J, Panzar J C, Willig R D. Contestable Markets and the Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1982.
    1. Beaulieu N D. Externalities in Overlapping Supplier Networks. 2002. Unpublished Manuscript.
    1. Born P H, Simon C J. Patients and Profits: The Relationship between HMO Financial Performance and Quality of Care. Health Affairs. 2001;20(2):167–74. - PubMed
    1. Diaconis P. Theories of Data Analysis: From Magical Thinking through Classical Statistics. In: Hoaglin D C, Mostellor F, Tukey J, editors. Exploring Data Tables, Trends, and Shapes. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1985. pp. 1–36.

Publication types

MeSH terms