Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep 15;14(18):5672-7.
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1267.

Translational Research Working Group developmental pathway for biospecimen-based assessment modalities

Affiliations

Translational Research Working Group developmental pathway for biospecimen-based assessment modalities

Sudhir Srivastava et al. Clin Cancer Res. .

Abstract

The Translational Research Working Group (TRWG) was created as a national initiative to evaluate the current status of National Cancer Institute's investment in translational research and envision its future. The TRWG conceptualized translational research as a set of six developmental processes or pathways focused on various clinical goals. One of those pathways describes the development of biospecimen-based assays that use biomarkers for the detection, diagnosis, and prognosis of cancer and the assessment of response to cancer treatment. The biospecimen-based assessment modality pathway was conceived not as comprehensive description of the corresponding real-world processes but rather as a tool designed to facilitate movement of a candidate assay through the translational process to the point where it can be handed off for definitive clinical testing. This paper introduces the pathway in the context of prior work and discusses key challenges associated with the biomarker development process in light of the pathway.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Biospecimen-Based Assessment Modality (BM) Pathway. The BM pathway is depicted as a flowchart, a schematic process representation widely used in engineering. Rounded rectangle at the top, the origin of the process. Square-cornered rectangles, activity steps. Diamonds, conditional tests or decision steps. Unidirectional arrows, the direction of the activity sequence, and the direction of transfer of supporting tools from their parallel development paths to the main path of modality development. The three diamonds in the initial steps of the pathway (blue) are decisions required to proceed through the pathway and represent the credentialing step. Subsequent steps include the development of supporting tools (red), the creation of the modality (green), preclinical development (purple), and early stage clinical trials (yellow). For each activity or decision point, it is understood that there are many more variations that can occur, and that not all steps may occur in each instance. The pathway does not address the ways in which insights gained from late-stage clinical trials can influence the development process. Biospecimen-based assessment devices can be used for screening, early detection, diagnosis, prediction, prognosis, or response assessment. The pathways are conceived not as comprehensive descriptions of the corresponding real-world processes but as tools designed to serve specific purposes, including research program and project management, coordination of research efforts, and professional and lay education and communication.

References

    1. Nass SJ, Moses HL, editors. Cancer Biomarkers: The Promises and Challenges of Improving Detection and Treatment. Institute of Medicine; Washington (DC): 2007. Committee on Developing Biomarker-Based Tools for Cancer Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment.
    1. Hawk ET, Matrisian LM, Nelson WG, et al. The Translational Research Working Group developmental pathways: introduction and overview. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5664–71. - PubMed
    1. Pepe MS, Etzioni R, Feng Z, et al. Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1054–61. - PubMed
    1. Ransohoff DF. Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:309–14. - PubMed
    1. Ransohoff DF. Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5:142–9. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances