Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma
- PMID: 18794455
- DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.9.1120
Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma
Abstract
Objective: To determine the predictive dermoscopic features of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma.
Design: A total of 105 melanomas (median Breslow thickness, 0.76 mm), 170 benign melanocytic lesions, and 222 nonmelanocytic lesions lacking significant pigment (amelanotic, partially pigmented, and light colored) were imaged using glass-plate dermoscopy devices and scored for 99 dermoscopic features. Diagnostic models were derived from and tested on independent randomly selected lesions.
Setting: Predominantly hospital-based clinics from 5 continents.
Main outcome measures: Sensitivity, specificity, and odds ratios for individual features and models for the diagnosis of melanoma and malignancy.
Results: The most significant negative predictors of melanoma were having multiple (>3) milialike cysts (odds ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.64), comma vessels with a regular distribution (0.10; 0.01-0.70), comma vessels as the predominant vessel type (0.16; 0.05-0.52), symmetrical pigmentation pattern (0.18; 0.09-0.39), irregular blue-gray globules (0.20; 0.05-0.87), and multiple blue-gray globules (0.28; 0.10-0.81). The most significant positive predictors were having a blue-white veil (odds ratio,13; 95% confidence interval, 3.9-40.0), scarlike depigmentation (4.4; 2.4-8.0), multiple blue-gray dots (3.5; 1.9-6.4), irregularly shaped depigmentation (3.3; 2.0-5.3), irregular brown dots/globules (3.2; 1.8-5.6), 5 to 6 colors (3.2; 1.6-6.3), and predominant central vessels (3.1; 1.6-6.0). A simple model distinguishing melanomas from all nonmelanomas had a sensitivity of 70% and a specificity of 56% in the test set. A model distinguishing all malignant lesions from benign lesions had a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 37%. Conclusion Although the diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for melanoma lacking significant pigment is inferior to that of more pigmented lesions, features distinguishing the former from benign lesions can be visualized on dermoscopic evaluation.
Comment on
-
Dermoscopy and the diagnostic challenge of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma.Arch Dermatol. 2008 Sep;144(9):1207-10. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.9.1207. Arch Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 18794468 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic features.Br J Dermatol. 2004 Jun;150(6):1117-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.05928.x. Br J Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15214897
-
Dermoscopic evaluation of nodular melanoma.JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Jun;149(6):699-709. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.2466. JAMA Dermatol. 2013. PMID: 23553375
-
The significance of eccentric and central hyperpigmentation, multifocal hyper/hypopigmentation, and the multicomponent pattern in melanocytic lesions lacking specific dermoscopic features of melanoma.Arch Dermatol. 2008 Nov;144(11):1440-4. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.11.1440. Arch Dermatol. 2008. PMID: 19015418
-
Nonmelanocytic lesions defying the two-step dermoscopy algorithm.Dermatol Surg. 2006 Nov;32(11):1398-406. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32312.x. Dermatol Surg. 2006. PMID: 17083595 Review.
-
Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions.Br J Dermatol. 2004 Nov;151(5):1029-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06210.x. Br J Dermatol. 2004. PMID: 15541081 Review.
Cited by
-
More than one shade of pink as a marker of early amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma.J Dermatol. 2024 Jul;51(7):999-1003. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.17200. Epub 2024 Mar 25. J Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 39412946 Free PMC article.
-
Dermoscopy of Melanoma and Non-melanoma Skin Cancers.Front Med (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 21;6:180. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2019.00180. eCollection 2019. Front Med (Lausanne). 2019. PMID: 31497603 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Recent advances in dermoscopy.F1000Res. 2016 Feb 17;5:F1000 Faculty Rev-184. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7597.1. eCollection 2016. F1000Res. 2016. PMID: 26949523 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Standardization of terminology in dermoscopy/dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Jun;74(6):1093-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.038. Epub 2016 Feb 17. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016. PMID: 26896294 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Enhancing Skin Cancer Diagnosis with Dermoscopy.Dermatol Clin. 2017 Oct;35(4):417-437. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Aug 7. Dermatol Clin. 2017. PMID: 28886798 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical