Machine learning for in silico virtual screening and chemical genomics: new strategies
- PMID: 18795887
- PMCID: PMC2748698
- DOI: 10.2174/138620708785739899
Machine learning for in silico virtual screening and chemical genomics: new strategies
Abstract
Support vector machines and kernel methods belong to the same class of machine learning algorithms that has recently become prominent in both computational biology and chemistry, although both fields have largely ignored each other. These methods are based on a sound mathematical and computationally efficient framework that implicitly embeds the data of interest, respectively proteins and small molecules, in high-dimensional feature spaces where various classification or regression tasks can be performed with linear algorithms. In this review, we present the main ideas underlying these approaches, survey how both the "biological" and the "chemical" spaces have been separately constructed using the same mathematical framework and tricks, and suggest different avenues to unify both spaces for the purpose of in silico chemogenomics.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Chemogenomics: a discipline at the crossroad of high throughput technologies, biomarker research, combinatorial chemistry, genomics, cheminformatics, bioinformatics and artificial intelligence.Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2008 Sep;11(8):583-6. doi: 10.2174/138620708785739961. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2008. PMID: 18795877 Review.
-
Computational chemogenomics approaches to systematic knowledge-based drug discovery.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2004 May;7(3):304-13. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2004. PMID: 15216933 Review.
-
Virtual screening with support vector machines and structure kernels.Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009 May;12(4):409-23. doi: 10.2174/138620709788167926. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2009. PMID: 19442068 Review.
-
Rethinking Drug Repositioning and Development with Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Omics.OMICS. 2019 Nov;23(11):539-548. doi: 10.1089/omi.2019.0151. Epub 2019 Oct 25. OMICS. 2019. PMID: 31651216
-
In silico machine learning methods in drug development.Curr Top Med Chem. 2014;14(16):1913-22. doi: 10.2174/1568026614666140929124203. Curr Top Med Chem. 2014. PMID: 25262800
Cited by
-
Evaluation of deep and shallow learning methods in chemogenomics for the prediction of drugs specificity.J Cheminform. 2020 Feb 10;12(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13321-020-0413-0. J Cheminform. 2020. PMID: 33431042 Free PMC article.
-
Designing focused chemical libraries enriched in protein-protein interaction inhibitors using machine-learning methods.PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Mar 5;6(3):e1000695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000695. PLoS Comput Biol. 2010. PMID: 20221258 Free PMC article.
-
Applicability Domain of Active Learning in Chemical Probe Identification: Convergence in Learning from Non-Specific Compounds and Decision Rule Clarification.Molecules. 2019 Jul 26;24(15):2716. doi: 10.3390/molecules24152716. Molecules. 2019. PMID: 31357419 Free PMC article.
-
Synthetic molecules: helping to unravel plant signal transduction.J Chem Biol. 2013 Mar 3;6(2):43-50. doi: 10.1007/s12154-013-0091-8. eCollection 2013 Mar 3. J Chem Biol. 2013. PMID: 24432124 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison Study of Computational Prediction Tools for Drug-Target Binding Affinities.Front Chem. 2019 Nov 20;7:782. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00782. eCollection 2019. Front Chem. 2019. PMID: 31824921 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jaakkola T, Diekhans M, Haussler D.A. J. Comput. Biol. 2000;7:95–114. - PubMed
-
- Lanckriet GRG, De Bie T, Cristianini N, Jordan MI, Noble WS. Bioinformatics. 2004;20:2626–2635. - PubMed
-
- Dobson PD, Doig AJ. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;345:187–199. - PubMed
-
- Blake JF. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2000;11:104–107. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources