Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2008 Sep 16:8:33.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-8-33.

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin 600 mg/d for treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Efficacy and safety of pregabalin 600 mg/d for treating painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a double-blind placebo-controlled trial

Joseph C Arezzo et al. BMC Neurol. .

Abstract

Background: Recent consensus guidelines recommend pregabalin as a first-tier treatment for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin 600 mg/d (300 mg dosed BID) versus placebo for relieving DPN-associated neuropathic pain, and assessed its safety using objective measures of nerve conduction (NC).

Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, the primary efficacy measure was endpoint mean pain score (MPS) from daily pain diaries (11-point scale). NC velocity and sensory and motor amplitudes were assessed at baseline, endpoint, and end of follow-up (2 weeks post-treatment). At each timepoint, the median-motor, median-sensory, ulnar-sensory, and peroneal-motor nerves were evaluated. Secondary efficacy measures included weekly MPS and proportion of responders (patients achieving >or=50% reduction in MPS from baseline to endpoint). After 1-weeks' dosage escalation, pregabalin-treated patients received 300 mg BID for 12 weeks.

Results: Eighty-two patients received pregabalin and 85 placebo. Mean durations were 10 years for diabetes and approximately 5 years for painful DPN. Pregabalin-treated patients had lower MPS than controls (mean difference, -1.28; p <.001). For all four nerves, 95% CIs for median differences in amplitude and velocity from baseline to endpoint and baseline to follow-up included 0 (ie, no significant difference vs. placebo). Significant pain improvement among pregabalin-treated patients was evident at week 1 and sustained at every weekly timepoint. More pregabalin-treated patients (49%) than controls (23%) were responders (p <.001).

Conclusion: Pregabalin 600 mg/d (300 mg BID) effectively reduced pain, was well tolerated, and had no statistically significant or clinically meaningful effect on NC in patients with painful DPN.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00159679.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Weekly least-squares mean pain scores.
Figure 3
Figure 3
CGIC (A) and PGIC (B) scores.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean nerve amplitude (A) and nerve conduction (B) in patients treated with 600 mg/d pregabalin or placebo.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Median differences in nerve conduction parameters between treatment groups: pregabalin 600 mg/d vs. placebo.

References

    1. Schmader KE. Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy. Clin J Pain. 2002;18:350–354. - PubMed
    1. Dyck PJ. Pathology and pathophysiology – human and experimental. In: Dyck PJ, Thomas PK, Asbury AK, Winegrad AI, Porte D Jr, editor. Diabetic Neuropathy. Philadelphia: WB Saunders and Company; 1987. pp. 223–236.
    1. Yagihashi S. Pathology and pathogenetic mechanisms of diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Metab Rev. 1995;11:193–225. - PubMed
    1. Boulton AJM, Malik RA, Arezzo JC, Sosenko JM. Diabetic somatic neuropathies. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1458–1486. - PubMed
    1. Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R, Malik RA, Maser RE, Sosenko JM, Ziegler D. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:956–962. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data