NEAT: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial--toxicity, delivered dose intensity and quality of life
- PMID: 18797468
- PMCID: PMC2570521
- DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604674
NEAT: National Epirubicin Adjuvant Trial--toxicity, delivered dose intensity and quality of life
Abstract
The NEAT trial reported considerable benefit for ECMF (epirubicin followed by cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil) of 28% for relapse-free survival (RFS) and 30% for overall survival (OS), when compared with classical CMF in early breast cancer. To assess tolerability, toxicity, dose intensity and quality of life (QoL) analyses were undertaken. All 2021 eligible patients had common toxicity criteria (CTC), delivered chemotherapy and supportive treatments details and long-term morbidities recorded. The QoL substudy used multiple validated measures. ECMF produced low CTC scores, although higher than CMF for nausea, vomiting, alopecia, constipation, stomatitis (P<0.001), infection (P=0.001) and fatigue (P=0.03). Supportive treatments required, however, were similar across randomised treatments. On-treatment deaths were more common with CMF (13) than ECMF(5). Optimal course-delivered dose intensity (CDDI > or =85%) was received more often by ECMF patients (83 vs 76%: P=0.0002), and was associated with better RFS (P=0.0006). QoL over 2 years was equivalent across treatments, despite minimally worse side effects for ECMF during treatment. ECMF benefit spanned all levels of toxicity, CDDI and QoL. There are no reported acute myeloid leukaemias or cardiac dysfunctions. ECMF is tolerable, deliverable, and significantly more effective than CMF, with no serious long-term toxicity or QoL detriment.
Figures
References
-
- Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez Nj, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman Sb, Dehaes Jcjm, Kaasa S, Klee M, Osoba D, Razavi D, Rofe Pb, Schraub S, Sneeuw K, Sullivan M, Takeda F (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–376 - PubMed
-
- Bonadonna G, Valagussa P, Moliterni A, Zambetti M, Brambilla C (1995b) Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer: the results of 20 years of follow-up. N Engl J Med 332: 901–906 - PubMed
-
- Bonadonna G, Zambetti M, Valagussa P (1995a) Sequential or alternating doxorubicin and CMF regimens in breast cancer with more than three positive nodes. J Am Med Assoc 273: 542–547 - PubMed
-
- Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (1990) Introduction and Methods Sections, Treatment of Early Breast Cancer, Vol. 1. Worldwide Evidence 1985–1990. Oxford University Press: England
-
- Hryniuk W, Bush H (1984) The importance of dose intensity in chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2: 1281–1288 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical