Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Feb;19(2):446-54.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x. Epub 2008 Sep 17.

Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis

Affiliations

Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis

Alexandra Platon et al. Eur Radiol. 2009 Feb.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose CT with oral contrast medium (LDCT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and compare its performance with standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT (standard CT) according to patients' BMIs. Eighty-six consecutive patients admitted with suspicion of acute appendicitis underwent LDCT (30 mAs), followed by standard CT (180 mAs). Both examinations were reviewed by two experienced radiologists for direct and indirect signs of appendicitis. Clinical and surgical follow-up was considered as the reference standard. Appendicitis was confirmed by surgery in 37 (43%) of the 86 patients. Twenty-nine (34%) patients eventually had an alternative discharge diagnosis to explain their abdominal pain. Clinical and biological follow-up was uneventful in 20 (23%) patients. LDCT and standard CT had the same sensitivity (100%, 33/33) and specificity (98%, 45/46) to diagnose appendicitis in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >or= 18.5. In slim patients (BMI<18.5), sensitivity to diagnose appendicitis was 50% (2/4) for LDCT and 100% (4/4) for standard CT, while specificity was identical for both techniques (67%, 2/3). LDCT may play a role in the diagnostic workup of patients with a BMI >or= 18.5.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;93(3):417-21 - PubMed
    1. J Am Coll Radiol. 2006 Feb;3(2):115-21 - PubMed
    1. Clin Radiol. 2007 Jun;62(6):573-8 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1994 Jan;190(1):31-5 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):164-72 - PubMed

Publication types