Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis
- PMID: 18797875
- DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1164-x
Evaluation of a low-dose CT protocol with oral contrast for assessment of acute appendicitis
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate a low-dose CT with oral contrast medium (LDCT) for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis and compare its performance with standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT (standard CT) according to patients' BMIs. Eighty-six consecutive patients admitted with suspicion of acute appendicitis underwent LDCT (30 mAs), followed by standard CT (180 mAs). Both examinations were reviewed by two experienced radiologists for direct and indirect signs of appendicitis. Clinical and surgical follow-up was considered as the reference standard. Appendicitis was confirmed by surgery in 37 (43%) of the 86 patients. Twenty-nine (34%) patients eventually had an alternative discharge diagnosis to explain their abdominal pain. Clinical and biological follow-up was uneventful in 20 (23%) patients. LDCT and standard CT had the same sensitivity (100%, 33/33) and specificity (98%, 45/46) to diagnose appendicitis in patients with a body mass index (BMI) >or= 18.5. In slim patients (BMI<18.5), sensitivity to diagnose appendicitis was 50% (2/4) for LDCT and 100% (4/4) for standard CT, while specificity was identical for both techniques (67%, 2/3). LDCT may play a role in the diagnostic workup of patients with a BMI >or= 18.5.
Similar articles
-
Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT.Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2558-66. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2212-5. Epub 2011 Jul 30. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21805194
-
Suspicion of appendicitis in pregnant women: emergency evaluation by sonography and low-dose CT with oral contrast.Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):345-352. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5573-1. Epub 2018 Jun 15. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 29948087
-
Low-dose CT for patients with clinically suspected acute appendicitis: optimal strength of sinogram affirmed iterative reconstruction for image quality and diagnostic performance.Acta Radiol. 2015 Aug;56(8):899-907. doi: 10.1177/0284185114542297. Epub 2014 Aug 12. Acta Radiol. 2015. PMID: 25118330
-
Low vs. standard dose computed tomography in suspected acute appendicitis: Is it time for a change?Int J Surg. 2016 Jul;31:71-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.05.060. Epub 2016 Jun 2. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27262882 Review.
-
Comparison of Low- and Standard-Dose CT for the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis: A Meta-Analysis.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Jun;208(6):W198-W207. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.17274. Epub 2017 Mar 16. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017. PMID: 28301209 Review.
Cited by
-
Acute appendicitis: prospective evaluation of a diagnostic algorithm integrating ultrasound and low-dose CT to reduce the need of standard CT.Eur Radiol. 2011 Dec;21(12):2558-66. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2212-5. Epub 2011 Jul 30. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 21805194
-
State of the art: technologies for computed tomography dose reduction.Emerg Radiol. 2010 May;17(3):209-18. doi: 10.1007/s10140-009-0850-6. Epub 2009 Nov 20. Emerg Radiol. 2010. PMID: 19936808 Review.
-
Overuse of plain abdominal radiography in emergency departments: a retrospective cohort study.BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 14;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-3870-2. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019. PMID: 30642302 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Emergency assessment of patients with acute abdominal pain using low-dose CT with iterative reconstruction: a comparative study.Eur Radiol. 2017 Aug;27(8):3300-3309. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4712-9. Epub 2017 Jan 12. Eur Radiol. 2017. PMID: 28083698
-
Progress in the diagnosis of appendicitis: a report from Washington State's Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program.Ann Surg. 2012 Oct;256(4):586-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826a9602. Ann Surg. 2012. PMID: 22964731 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials