Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers
- PMID: 18799557
- PMCID: PMC2654614
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0800996
Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers
Erratum in
- N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2853
Abstract
Background: Computed tomographic (CT) colonography is a noninvasive option in screening for colorectal cancer. However, its accuracy as a screening tool in asymptomatic adults has not been well defined.
Methods: We recruited 2600 asymptomatic study participants, 50 years of age or older, at 15 study centers. CT colonographic images were acquired with the use of standard bowel preparation, stool and fluid tagging, mechanical insufflation, and multidetector-row CT scanners (with 16 or more rows). Radiologists trained in CT colonography reported all lesions measuring 5 mm or more in diameter. Optical colonoscopy and histologic review were performed according to established clinical protocols at each center and served as the reference standard. The primary end point was detection by CT colonography of histologically confirmed large adenomas and adenocarcinomas (10 mm in diameter or larger) that had been detected by colonoscopy; detection of smaller colorectal lesions (6 to 9 mm in diameter) was also evaluated.
Results: Complete data were available for 2531 participants (97%). For large adenomas and cancers, the mean (+/-SE) per-patient estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve for CT colonography were 0.90+/-0.03, 0.86+/-0.02, 0.23+/-0.02, 0.99+/-<0.01, and 0.89+/-0.02, respectively. The sensitivity of 0.90 (i.e., 90%) indicates that CT colonography failed to detect a lesion measuring 10 mm or more in diameter in 10% of patients. The per-polyp sensitivity for large adenomas or cancers was 0.84+/-0.04. The per-patient sensitivity for detecting adenomas that were 6 mm or more in diameter was 0.78.
Conclusions: In this study of asymptomatic adults, CT colonographic screening identified 90% of subjects with adenomas or cancers measuring 10 mm or more in diameter. These findings augment published data on the role of CT colonography in screening patients with an average risk of colorectal cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00084929; American College of Radiology Imaging Network [ACRIN] number, 6664.)
2008 Massachusetts Medical Society
Figures

Comment in
-
Colorectal cancer screening on stronger footing.N Engl J Med. 2008 Sep 18;359(12):1285-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe0806029. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 18799563 No abstract available.
-
Accuracy of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening.N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2842; author reply 2843-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc082141. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 19109581 No abstract available.
-
Accuracy of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening.N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2843; author reply 2843-4. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 19115493 No abstract available.
-
Accuracy of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening.N Engl J Med. 2008 Dec 25;359(26):2842-3; author reply 2843-4. N Engl J Med. 2008. PMID: 19115494 No abstract available.
-
Colorectal cancer screening with computed tomographic colonography.Gastroenterology. 2009 Apr;136(4):1451-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.02.035. Epub 2009 Feb 21. Gastroenterology. 2009. PMID: 19233331 No abstract available.
-
ACP Journal Club. CT colonography had 90% sensitivity and 86% specificity for diagnosing large adenomas and cancer in asymptomatic adults.Ann Intern Med. 2009 Feb 17;150(4):JC2-13. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-4-200902170-02013. Ann Intern Med. 2009. PMID: 19238611 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: a longitudinal study of natural history.Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jul;14(8):711-20. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70216-X. Epub 2013 Jun 7. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23746988 Free PMC article.
-
Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies.Radiology. 2005 Dec;237(3):927-37. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2373041747. Radiology. 2005. PMID: 16304113
-
Left-sided polyps detected at screening CT colonography: do we need complete optical colonoscopy for further evaluation?Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):429-34. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101702. Epub 2011 Feb 25. Radiology. 2011. PMID: 21357518
-
Comparison of the accuracy of CT colonography and colonoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.Colorectal Dis. 2014 Mar;16(3):O82-9. doi: 10.1111/codi.12506. Colorectal Dis. 2014. PMID: 24299052 Review.
-
[Virtual colonography].Med Klin (Munich). 2003 Dec 15;98(12):700-11. doi: 10.1007/s00063-003-1316-3. Med Klin (Munich). 2003. PMID: 14685671 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Novel Toilet Paper-Based Point-Of-Care Test for the Rapid Detection of Fecal Occult Blood: Instrument Validation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Aug 7;22(8):e20261. doi: 10.2196/20261. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32763879 Free PMC article.
-
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 27305518 Free PMC article.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study).Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74. Trials. 2013. PMID: 23497601 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Ascending colon rotation following patient positional change during CT colonography: a potential pitfall in interpretation.Eur Radiol. 2011 Feb;21(2):353-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-1928-y. Epub 2010 Aug 14. Eur Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20711732
-
Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia at 5 years: results from VA Cooperative Studies Program 380.Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Aug;105(8):1746-52. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.107. Epub 2010 Mar 16. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010. PMID: 20234348 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics 2008. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;58:71–96. - PubMed
-
- Guide to Clinical Preventive Services, 2006. Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. 2006. www.ahrq.gov/clinic/pocketgd/index.
-
- Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, et al. Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale--update based on new evidence. Gastroenterol. 2003;124(2):544–560. - PubMed
-
- Burling D, Halligan S, Slater A, Noakes MJ, Taylor SA. Potentially serious adverse events at CT colonography in symptomatic patients: national survey of the United Kingdom. Radiology. 2006;239(2):464–471. - PubMed
-
- Pickhardt PJ. Incidence of colonic perforation at CT colonography: review of existing data and implications for screening of asymptomatic adults (review) Radiology. 2006;239(2):313–316. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical