Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2008 Nov;23(11):1877-82.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0779-6. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment: examining the experiences of resident physicians and seriously-ill hospitalized patients

Kristy S Deep et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence-based recommendations for communication and decision making about life-sustaining treatment, resident physicians' actual practice may vary. Few prior studies have examined these conversations qualitatively to uncover why ineffective communication styles may persist.

Objective: To explore how discussions about life-sustaining treatment occur and examine the factors that influence physicians' communicative practices in hopes of providing novel insight into how these processes can be improved. PARTICIPANTS AND APPROACH: We conducted and recorded 56 qualitative semi-structured interviews with participants from 28 matched dyads of a resident physician and a hospitalized patient or their surrogate decision maker with whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation was discussed. Transcripts were analyzed and coded using the constant comparative method to develop themes.

Main results: Resident physicians introduced decisions about resuscitation in a scripted, depersonalized and procedure-focused manner. Decision makers exhibited a poor understanding of the decision they were being asked to make and resident physicians often disagreed with the decision. Residents did not advocate for a particular course of action; however, the discussions of resuscitation were framed in ways that may have implicitly influenced decision making.

Conclusions: Residents' communication practices may stem from their attempt to balance an informed choice model of decision making with their interest in providing appropriate care for the patient. Physicians' beliefs about mandatory autonomy may be an impediment to improving communication about patients' choices for life-sustaining treatment. Redefining the role of the physician will be necessary if a shared decision making model is to be adopted.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/archinte.166.15.1597', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.15.1597'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '16908792', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16908792/'}]}
    2. Smith AK, Ries AP, Zhang B, Tulsky JA, Prigerson HG, Block SD. Resident approaches to advance care planning on the day of hospital admission. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1597–1602. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/BF02599915', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02599915'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '7472700', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7472700/'}]}
    2. Tulsky JA, Chesney MA, Lo B. How do medical residents discuss resuscitation with patients? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:436–442. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00133.x', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00133.x'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1496983', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1496983/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9686710', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9686710/'}]}
    2. Fischer GS, Tulsky JA, Rose MR, Siminoff LA, Arnold RM. Patient knowledge and physician predictions of treatment preferences after discussion of advance directives. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:447–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00242-3', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9343(98)00242-3'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '9753025', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9753025/'}]}
    2. Haidet P, Hamel MB, Davis RB, Wenger N, Reding D, Kussin PS, Connors AF Jr, Lynn J, Weeks JC, Phillips RS. Outcomes, preferences for resuscitation and physician-patient communication among patients with metastatic colon cancer. SUPPORT investigators. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments. Am J Med. 1998;105:222–229. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.291.19.2359', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.291.19.2359'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15150208', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15150208/'}]}
    2. Epstein EM, Alper BS, Quill TE. The patient-physician relationship. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. JAMA. 2004;291:2359–2366. - PubMed

Publication types