Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2008 Dec;466(12):2923-32.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0509-8. Epub 2008 Sep 18.

Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison

S Robert Rozbruch  1 , Dawn Kleinman, Austin T Fragomen, Svetlana Ilizarov
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Limb lengthening and then insertion of an intramedullary nail: a case-matched comparison

S Robert Rozbruch et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec.

Abstract

Distraction osteogenesis is an effective method for lengthening, deformity correction, and treatment of nonunions and bone defects. The classic method uses an external fixator for both distraction and consolidation leading to lengthy times in frames and there is a risk of refracture after frame removal. We suggest a new technique: lengthening and then nailing (LATN) technique in which the frame is used for gradual distraction and then a reamed intramedullary nail inserted to support the bone during the consolidation phase, allowing early removal of the external fixator. We performed a retrospective case-matched comparison of patients lengthened with LATN (39 limbs in 27 patients) technique versus the classic (34 limbs in 27 patients). The LATN group wore the external fixator for less time than the classic group (12 versus 29 weeks). The LATN group had a lower external fixation index (0.5 versus 1.9) and a lower bone healing index (0.8 versus 1.9) than the classic group. LATN confers advantages over the classic method including shorter times needed in external fixation, quicker bone healing, and protection against refracture. There are also advantages over the lengthening over a nail and internal lengthening nail techniques.

Level of evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1A–D
Fig. 1A–D
This is a sawbone model illustrating LATN technique. (A) An axial view shows proximal fixation placed peripherally to avoid contact with future intramedullary nail. (B) This is a front view after 4-cm lengthening; note absent fixation on the middle ring. (C) Insertion of intramedullary nail is shown; note the targeting jig (EBI, Biomet Trauma, Parsippany, NJ) is not blocked by frame. (D) A Front axial view shows the proximal pin configuration and that the intramedullary nail is not blocked by the external fixation.
Fig. 2A–I
Fig. 2A–I
This is an example of a 23-year-old woman who underwent correction of varus, recurvatum, external rotation malunion, and 2.5 cm lengthening. (A) A preoperative front view shows deformity and shortening. (B) This is a preoperative AP radiograph. (C) This is a preoperative lateral radiograph. (D) This is an erect leg radiograph at end of distraction showing equal leg lengths and correction of deformity. (E) This is an AP radiograph 2 weeks after insertion of intramedullary nail. (F) This is an AP radiograph 3 months after insertion of intramedullary nail. (G) This is a lateral radiograph 3 months after insertion of intramedullary nail. (H) This is a front view 2 years after surgery. (I) This is an AP radiograph 2 years after surgery.
Fig. 3A–C
Fig. 3A–C
This is an example of a 45-year-old man who underwent 5 cm lengthening. (A) This is an anteroposterior (AP) radiograph at the end of distraction. (B) This is an AP radiograph 8 weeks after insertion of the intramedullary nail. (C) This is a lateral radiograph 8 weeks after insertion of the intramedullary nail.
Fig. 4A–E
Fig. 4A–E
This is an example of a 55-year-old woman who underwent ankle fusion and 10 cm lengthening for a segmental bone defect. (A) This is an AP radiograph at end of 10 cm distraction; the ankle fusion is stabilized more distally. (B) This is an AP radiograph 4 months after insertion of the intramedullary nail. (C) This is a lateral radiograph 4 months after insertion of the intramedullary nail. (D) This is an AP radiograph 9 months after insertion of the intramedullary nail. (E) This is a lateral radiograph 9 months after insertion of the intramedullary nail.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1097/00005131-200211000-00006', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200211000-00006'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12439195', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12439195/'}]}
    2. Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Bone formation following intramedullary femoral reaming is decreased by indomethacin and antibodies to insulin-like growth factors. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:717–722. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '2355035', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2355035/'}]}
    2. Blachut PA, Meek RN, O’Brien PJ. External fixation and delayed intramedullary nailing of open fractures of the tibial shaft. A sequential protocol. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:729–735. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.2106/JBJS.F.00742', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.f.00742'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17200326', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17200326/'}]}
    2. Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. Exchange nailing of ununited fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:177–188. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.027', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2003.12.027'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15121017', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15121017/'}]}
    2. Carvalho RS, Einhorn TA, Lehmann W, Edgar C, Al-Yamani A, Apazidis A, Pacicca D, Clemens TL, Gerstenfeld LC. The role of angiogenesis in a murine tibial model of distraction osteogenesis. Bone. 2004;34:849–861. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '11812486', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11812486/'}]}
    2. Cole JD, Justin D, Kasparis T, DeVlught D, Knobloch C. The intramedullary skeletal kinetic distractor (ISKD): first clinical results of a new intramedullary nail for lengthening of the femur and tibia. Injury. 2001;32(4):SD129–SD139. - PubMed

Publication types