Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique
- PMID: 18802681
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-008-1292-4
Lithium dilution cardiac output measurement in the critically ill patient: determination of precision of the technique
Abstract
Background: Lithium dilution cardiac output by LiDCOplus (LiDCO, Cambridge, UK) is a validated methodology for measuring cardiac output. It is used to calibrate a pulse pressure analysis algorithm (PulseCO) for the continuous measurement of subsequent changes in this variable. The variability of measurements, or precision, within patients of lithium dilution cardiac output has not previously been described.
Material and methods: Thirty-five hemodynamically stable patients in intensive care, with no significant variability in heart rate, mean arterial pressure or central venous pressure, were recruited. Fifty-three determinations of cardiac output were made, each using four lithium dilution measurement curves performed consecutively within a maximum period of 10 min. The coefficient of variation of the measurements was determined and used to derive the least significant change in cardiac output that this technique could reliably detect.
Results: For a single measurement, the coefficient of variation was 8%. This equates to the technique being able to detect a change (least significant change) between two measurements of 24%. Averaging two lithium dilution measurements improved the coefficient of variation to 6% with a least significant change of 17%. Using the average of three curves reduced the coefficient of variation to 5% with a least significant change of 14%.
Conclusions: To achieve a good precision with this technique, three lithium dilution measurements should be averaged. This will allow changes in cardiac output of more than 14% to be reliably detected. The understanding of the precision of this technique allows the user to know when a real change has happened to their patient.
Similar articles
-
Lithium dilution measurement of cardiac output and arterial pulse waveform analysis: an indicator dilution calibrated beat-by-beat system for continuous estimation of cardiac output.Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Jun;8(3):257-61. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200206000-00010. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002. PMID: 12386506 Review.
-
Lithium dilution, pulse power analysis, and continuous thermodilution cardiac output measurements compared with bolus thermodilution in anaesthetized ponies.Br J Anaesth. 2012 Dec;109(6):864-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aes269. Epub 2012 Aug 27. Br J Anaesth. 2012. PMID: 22926200
-
Equipment review: an appraisal of the LiDCO plus method of measuring cardiac output.Crit Care. 2004 Jun;8(3):190-5. doi: 10.1186/cc2852. Epub 2004 May 5. Crit Care. 2004. PMID: 15153237 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Accuracy of Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement With the LiDCOplus System During Intra-Aortic Counterpulsation After Cardiac Surgery.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):592-8. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.09.022. Epub 2015 Oct 1. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016. PMID: 26718662 Clinical Trial.
-
[Estimating cardiac output. Utility in the clinical practice. Available invasive and non-invasive monitoring].Med Intensiva. 2011 Dec;35(9):552-61. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2011.01.014. Epub 2011 Mar 15. Med Intensiva. 2011. PMID: 21411188 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Cardiac output obtained by pulse pressure analysis: to calibrate or not to calibrate may not be the only question when used properly.Intensive Care Med. 2013 Apr;39(4):787-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2802-y. Epub 2013 Jan 4. Intensive Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23287877 No abstract available.
-
Pulse pressure analysis: to make a long story short.Crit Care. 2010;14(4):175. doi: 10.1186/cc9065. Epub 2010 Jul 12. Crit Care. 2010. PMID: 20663181 Free PMC article.
-
Cardiac output in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: association with arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure wave amplitudes and outcome of shunt surgery.Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011 Feb 4;8(1):11. doi: 10.1186/2045-8118-8-11. Fluids Barriers CNS. 2011. PMID: 21349148 Free PMC article.
-
Agreement between stroke volume measured by oesophageal Doppler and uncalibrated pulse contour analysis during fluid loads in severe aortic stenosis.J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Aug;29(4):435-41. doi: 10.1007/s10877-015-9666-y. Epub 2015 Feb 1. J Clin Monit Comput. 2015. PMID: 25638514
-
Precision of the transpulmonary thermodilution measurements.Crit Care. 2011 Aug 27;15(4):R204. doi: 10.1186/cc10421. Crit Care. 2011. PMID: 21871112 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical