Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio program
- PMID: 18803810
- PMCID: PMC2561037
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-318
Can colorectal cancer mass-screening organization be evidence-based? Lessons from failures: the experimental and pilot phases of the Lazio program
Abstract
Background: Screening programmes should be organized to translate theoretical efficacy into effectiveness. An evidence-based organizational model of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) should assure feasibility and high compliance.
Methods: A multidisciplinary Working Group (WG), reviewed literature and guidelines to define evidence-based recommendations. The WG identified the need for further local studies: physicians' CRCS attitudes, the effect of test type and provider on compliance, and individual reasons for non-compliance. A survey of digestive endoscopy services was conducted. A feasibility study on a target population of 300.000 has begun.
Results: Based on the results of population trials and on literature review the screening strategy adopted was Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) every two years for 50-74 year olds and, for positives, colonoscopy. The immunochemical test was chosen because it has 20% higher compliance than the Guaiac. GPs were chosen as the preferred provider also for higher compliance. Since we observed that distance is the major determinant of non-compliance, we choose GPs because they are the closest providers, both geographically and emotionally, to the public. The feasibility study showed several barriers: GP participation was low, there were administrative problems to involve GPs; opportunistic testing by the GPs; difficulties in access to Gastroenterology centres; difficulties in gathering colonoscopy results; little time given to screening activity by the gastroenterology centre.
Conclusion: The feasibility study highlighted several limits of the model. Most of the barriers that emerged were consequences of organisational choices not supported by evidence. The principal limit was a lack of accountability by the participating centres.
Figures

Similar articles
-
[Evidence-based planning: the case of mass screening for colorectal cancer in the Lazio region of Italy].Ann Ig. 2005 Jul-Aug;17(4):313-22. Ann Ig. 2005. PMID: 16156391 Italian.
-
Survey on colorectal cancer screening knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general practice physicians in Lazio, Italy.Prev Med. 2005 Jul;41(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.11.010. Epub 2004 Dec 30. Prev Med. 2005. PMID: 15916990
-
Would general practitioners support a population-based colorectal cancer screening programme of faecal-occult blood testing?Intern Med J. 2004 Sep-Oct;34(9-10):532-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00652.x. Intern Med J. 2004. PMID: 15482265
-
[The state of the colorectal screening in Hungary: lessons of the pilot programs].Orv Hetil. 2007 Sep 23;148(38):1787-93. doi: 10.1556/OH.2007.28192. Orv Hetil. 2007. PMID: 17872333 Review. Hungarian.
-
Screening for colorectal cancer.Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Nov;8 Suppl 1:s10-3. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0098-9. Tech Coloproctol. 2004. PMID: 15655587 Review.
References
-
- Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D, Bond J, Burt R, Ferrucci J, Ganiats T, Levin T, Woolf S, Johnson D, Kirk L, Litin S, Simmang C, Gastrointestinal Consortium Panel Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationale-Update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology. 2003;124:544–60. doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50044. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Towler BP, Irwig L, Glasziou P, Weller D, Kewenter J. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000:CD001216. - PubMed
-
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: recommendation and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:129–31. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical