The VEPRO trial: a cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
- PMID: 18803826
- PMCID: PMC2556995
- DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-9-54
The VEPRO trial: a cross-over randomised controlled trial comparing 2 progressive lenses for patients with presbyopia
Abstract
The aim of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of two generations of progressive lenses for presbyopia.
Methods: A multicenter cross-over randomized controlled trial performed in a primary care setting (5 optical dispensaries) was planned. Two categories of progressive lenses were compared: 1) a new-generation lens (i.e., VARILUX PANAMIC ORMA CRIZAL), which is expensive but a supposed improvement in comfort, and 2) an older-generation lens (i.e., VARILUX CONFORT ORMA CRIZAL), which is less expensive and is considered the reference lens. Patients were randomized to wear one generation of progressive lens for 4 weeks, then cross over to wear the other lens for 4 weeks, without knowing the sequence of lenses. Inclusion criteria were 1) age 43-60 years; 2) outpatients already wearing progressive lenses and referred to an optician ophthalmologist for optical correction prescription within the last 6 months; 3) receiving a correction of </=3 dioptres in cases of associated myopia, hyperopia or astigmatism; 4) understanding and speaking French and able to answer a questionnaire; and 5) giving written consent to participate in the study.The primary outcome was patient preference for one progressive lens at week 8. Secondary outcomes were subjective measures of bifocal visual performance, including a) near visual acuity, b) visual field, c) kinetic visual skills, d) visual adaptability, e) visual comfort, and f) rapidity of adaptation.
Results: 127 patients were randomized to one of the lens groups. Two patients withdrew prematurely; 98.4% and 97.6% patients who wore the new versus older lenses, respectively, wore their progressive lenses every day during the 4-week period 1 and period 2. The number of participants in each of 5 centres varied from 16 (12.6%) to 35 (27.6%).57.9% patients preferred the new-generation lenses, 36.5% the older-generation lenses, and 5.6% had no preference (p = 0.01). The two groups did not differ in any of the measures of bifocal visual performance except near visual acuity.
Conclusion: Patients with presbyopia had slightly higher preference for the new-generation than older-generation lens, with no difference in lens groups for most of the visual outcomes assessed.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00635115.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Contrast visual acuity with bifocal contact lenses.Eye Contact Lens. 2007 Mar;33(2):98-102. doi: 10.1097/01.icl.0000240502.18499.15. Eye Contact Lens. 2007. PMID: 17496703
-
Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.Eye Contact Lens. 2003 Jul;29(3):181-4. doi: 10.1097/01.ICL.0000072827.42925.49. Eye Contact Lens. 2003. PMID: 12861114 Clinical Trial.
-
Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.Optom Vis Sci. 2006 Aug;83(8):611-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000232185.00091.45. Optom Vis Sci. 2006. PMID: 16909087
-
[Acceptance of progressive lenses].Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Aug-Sep;209(2-3):94-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035285. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996. PMID: 8992091 German.
-
Developments in the correction of presbyopia I: spectacle and contact lenses.Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014 Jan;34(1):8-29. doi: 10.1111/opo.12091. Epub 2013 Nov 10. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2014. PMID: 24205890 Review.
References
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical